Archive   |   Biography   |   RSS Feed   |   Opinions Home   |   Politics Home

A Study In Comity

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By David S. Broder
Wednesday, December 6, 2006

Whatever the final impact of the Iraq Study Group report being issued today, for the 10 commission members this was an exhilarating experience, a demonstration of genuine bipartisanship that they hope will serve as an example to the broader political world.

"It was a very wonderful experience," former Republican senator Al Simpson of Wyoming told me last weekend. "We very quickly stopped considering ourselves as Republicans and Democrats, but as Americans trying to deal with a most urgent problem."

The nine men and one woman serving on the commission -- five from each party -- represented a wide range of political backgrounds and philosophical views. Several had been on opposing sides in past presidential campaigns.

But as commission member Vernon Jordan, the Democratic lawyer, noted, they were also "professionals" -- veterans of public service. Jordan has served on presidential commissions of one sort or another since 1965, and said, "This process has been a lesson in civility."

Leon Panetta, a former Democratic congressman and Clinton White House chief of staff, said the high average age of the 10 commission members contributed to its success. "This is a different generation of policymakers," said Panetta, who at 68 was one of the youngest members. "These are people who have very different views but are comfortable trying to understand each other and coming together to solve a terrible issue facing the country."

The analogy suggested by Simpson and Panetta, both veterans of Capitol Hill, and endorsed by Jordan, is that the commission functioned like a successful House-Senate conference committee. Members fought to include (or exclude) points that were especially important to them, "but in the end," as Jordan noted, "you have to have the votes to pass it."

"We went over the recommendations word by word until everyone was satisfied," Simpson said. "No one was trying to sneak anything in, and no one was laying traps. It was a very powerful experience."

Despite all the goodwill, several of the members recounted that toward the end of their deliberations, one commissioner -- not someone who had served in Congress, they noted -- said he would not sign the report if one part was not removed.

James A. Baker III, the former Republican secretary of state, glanced at his co-chairman, former Democratic representative Lee Hamilton, and calmly said to the dissenter, "Okay, don't."

A little later, others recalled, the dissenting member asked to return to the disputed passage and, in short order, agreed to slightly modified language.

"No one wanted to see us embarrassed by being unable to come to consensus," Simpson said.

Panetta observed that while most of the commission members had had some dealings with each other in their previous positions, they really bonded during their inspection trip to Baghdad earlier this year. "Fifteen hours on the plane together and three days in a tough place -- that was a human experience where we shared a lot and really got to know each other," he said.


CONTINUED     1        >

More Washington Post Opinions

PostPartisan

Post Partisan

Quick takes from The Post's opinion writers.

Washington Sketch

Washington Sketch

Dana Milbank writes about political theater in the capital.

Tom Toles

Tom Toles

See his latest editorial cartoon.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity