Shift in Congress Puts Health Care Back on the Table

By Christopher Lee
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, December 25, 2006

Health care is set to return to the national political stage in 2007, setting up partisan clashes in Congress that could end with rare vetoes from President Bush and help to define the 2008 presidential campaigns.

After years in which Iraq and national security dominated the debate -- and memories of the 1994 Clinton health plan debacle made major health-care changes politically radioactive -- the return of Democratic control in the House and Senate and the ramping up of the presidential campaigns are expected to bring health policy back into the legislative mix.

Two of the House Democrats' top priorities in their "Six for '06" campaign agenda involved health care. Within the first 100 hours of the new Congress, Democratic leaders intend to pass bills in the House that would lift restrictions on federally funded embryonic stem cell research and require the government to negotiate for lower prescription drug prices for Medicare beneficiaries. Their counterparts in the Senate, where it takes 60 votes to keep a bill moving, say those issues will be on the agenda there, too, but are unlikely to advance as quickly.

Key lawmakers and their aides in both parties say other health-policy initiatives likely to surface include renewing funding for the state-federal health-insurance program for children of the working poor, expanding access to health insurance generally, and beefing up drug-safety efforts at the Food and Drug Administration. Also in the works are efforts to promote electronic medical records, ease restrictions on the importation of low-cost prescription drugs from Canada, devise a better way of paying doctors under Medicare and improve the subsidized drug coverage for low-income Medicare beneficiaries.

"There is really a lot of excitement on our side of the aisle in Congress," said Wendell Primus, senior policy adviser on budget and health issues to House Speaker-elect Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). "The members are ready to get down to work."

Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), the top Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said that several issues are ripe for bipartisan compromise but that others, such as drug-price negotiations, will be more contentious. Expanding coverage for the uninsured also will be difficult, he said, "because Democrats don't like the small-business-insurance reform that Republicans do, and they are never going to be able to get a universal plan because it gets right back to Hillary Care, and everybody knows what a debacle that was."

Kevin Smith, spokesman for incoming House Minority Leader John A. Boehner (R-Ohio), said Republicans would try to work with Democrats, but "if they start charting a path that we believe is not right for the American people, then there are going to be some very interesting battles on Capitol Hill."

Passage of the initiatives in many instances is far from certain. A few face strong opposition from the White House and in some cases would require significant new funding at a time when Democrats say they want to demonstrate fiscal responsibility by reining in the federal budget deficit.

Still, even measures that do not win approval can be recycled into political grist for the 2008 presidential campaign, in which health care is expected to be a major issue. When Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said this month that he would introduce legislation in the next Congress to create a centrally financed system of private health insurance for every American, his goal seemed as much to influence the presidential debate as to win passage of a bill that many analysts consider a long shot.

"Medical costs are hitting every part of this nation like a wrecking ball," Wyden said. "The last time America tried to fix health care was in 1993 and 1994. . . . Getting this on the presidential agenda so that candidates of both political parties have got to get beyond position papers is an especially important point."

The debates will unfold against a backdrop of growing dissatisfaction with the health-care system and mounting frustration over rising costs. Fifty-nine percent of 1,000 people surveyed by the Employee Benefit Research Institute between May and June rated the nation's health care system as "poor" or "fair."

Census figures show that a record 46.6 million Americans, including 8.3 million children, had no health insurance in 2005, up from 45.3 million in 2004. Meanwhile, premiums for those with coverage were up 7.7 percent in 2006, to $11,480 for a family of four in employer-sponsored plans.

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2006 The Washington Post Company