GOP Lawmakers Divided About 'Surge' in Troops

Bush has been hoping for bipartisan support for his new policy. But with the exception of Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.), comments from the leading Democratic experts on national security matters last week indicated strong opposition to any plan that would involve increasing troops in Iraq beyond the current level of roughly 140,000 soldiers. And while McCain has been joined by Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (S.C.) in promoting the idea of sending more troops, many other Republicans appear to be laying back.

"Republicans are scared to death of it politically," said Ed Rogers, a top GOP lobbyist with ties to the White House and Republican leaders on the Hill. "The fear is that it won't make any difference. There won't be a perception of turning the corner."

The top GOP leaders on the Hill appear to be taking a wait-and-see attitude. Kevin Smith, spokesman for House Republican Leader John A. Boehner (Ohio), said "it will be important to get a clear sense of how any additional troops will fit into the overall strategy of rooting out the terrorist and insurgent elements in Iraq, and helping the Iraqis stabilize their democracy."

Incoming GOP Senate leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) said in a statement that it would be premature to comment "until the White House and General [Peter] Pace articulate the tasks and mission associated with any surge."

Sen. John E. Sununu (R-N.H.), a member of the Foreign Relations Committee who also is up for reelection in 2008, said the president's new plan must address "not only the security needs of large cities like Baghdad, but also the very significant internal changes that need to take place in Iraq to assure long-term stability." He cited such steps as a new oil law that spreads the wealth from the country's major natural resource and going ahead with provincial elections that could give more authority to the minority Sunni population, which has been disaffected by the Shiite empowerment.

Sununu declined to say what he thinks about more troops, but one of his colleagues from the Northeast, Maine's Collins, said she was flatly opposed to the idea after discussing it with commanders and Iraqis during a trip with McCain, Graham and Lieberman.

"I don't think the addition of new American troops in a situation plagued by sectarian strife is the answer," Collins said. "I think more American troops will present more American targets."

She said in an interview that she was also influenced by a meeting the senators had with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. "The prime minister made it pretty clear that he did not welcome the idea of more American troops," she said. "I would speculate that he recognizes that he needs to take control of the situation, that if he's seen as completely dependent on American troops it's difficult for him to establish his legitimacy."

Rep. Peter T. King (N.Y.), the top Republican on the Homeland Security Committee, cautioned that broad GOP support is conditioned on the way Bush presents the idea.

"If the military believes it would work, I would support it," King said. "A lot of it depends on how he makes his case. You will not see the same automatic support for the president as you have for the last few years . . . I have questions myself, but I just think it would be a disaster to pull out of Iraq."

Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) said Sunday on CNN's "Late Edition" that at this point he could not support more troops for Iraq. "If there is a road map to victory, then I would be prepared to listen to what the president has to say about more troops. But on this date of the record, I do not see it," he said.

Staff researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.