Mine Safety Measures Yet to Take Effect

Drager Safety Regional Sales Manager Mary Doane, right, helps coal board member Rick Glover, center, put on a Drager self-contained breathing apparatus as UMWA member Carl Egnor, left, and Miners' Health Safety & Training deputy director C.A. Phillips look on at the West Virginia Office of Miners' Health Safety & Training offices in Charleston, W.Va., Wednesday, Aug. 16, 2006. (AP Photo/Bob Bird) (Bob Bird - AP)

"There's a lot of good language in the MINER Act," said UMW health and safety director Dennis O'Dell. "Those things under the MINER Act haven't really been implemented yet."

Richard Stickler, the director of the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), believes current measures make mines safer.

The new federal law requires miners to have at least a two-hour supply of air with them while they work _ an increase from a one-hour standard. And it requires mines to store extra air packs underground, as well as provide more frequent and extensive training to miners on their use. It also mandates more highly trained mine rescue teams, high-tech communications and tracking devices and emergency shelters to help trapped miners survive.

Mine operators have met the air pack requirement by ordering more of the devices, but many have yet to reach the mines: purchase orders are considered proof of compliance. The two manufacturers that dominate the industry report yearlong backlogs.

Regulators have made other improvements. For instance, MSHA approved a proximity detector capable of shutting down a continuous mining machine that gets close enough to crush a miner. The device is not mandated and it is unclear if its use is widespread.

Yet much remains undone.

Investigators have concluded the Sago explosion unleashed explosive forces as high as 95 pounds per square inch (psi) from an abandoned and sealed area of the mine. That unprecedented pressure obliterated the foam block seals, which were designed to the old federal standard of 20 psi.

MSHA has since upped the standard to 50 psi, but no one knows how to build seals that strong, or how to strengthen thousands of existing seals built to the old standard.

Regardless, Stickler says rules requiring even-stronger seals are on MSHA's to-do list for 2007.

Despite the theory that lightning touched off the explosion, Stickler says MSHA won't know how to prevent another occurrence until the investigators give details of how the explosion occurred.

Other safety improvements seem to be stalling altogether.

West Virginia's August deadline for mines to submit plans for high-tech wireless communications has come and gone.

"I haven't heard anything different from six months ago," said Dale Birchfield, a member of the state Mine Safety Technology Task Force. That's when developers of a promising system reported their gear penetrates a relatively meager 300 feet of earth.

MSHA hasn't found a "system that will really work the way we envision it _ that would provide communication through the earth without antennas underground that would be destroyed by a fire or explosion," Stickler said.

While there were a number of high-profile mining tragedies in 2006, most of the year's 35 fatalities involved roof falls and heavy equipment mishaps.

"We need to take care of the things that we know," O'Dell said, citing a need for better roof supports, stronger ventilation fans, water systems to control coal dust and installation of proximity detectors.

Though Congress appropriated another $10 million for safety research in 2006, lobbyist Watzman said more federal funding is required.

"When you talk about covering breathing technology and refuge chambers and seals and tracking technology and communications, $10 million doesn't go very far," Watzman said.