Correction to This Article
The Fast Forward column in the Jan. 7 Business section misstated the storage quota of Microsoft's Live Mail service. Users can keep up to 2 gigabytes of e-mail on the service.

Web-Mail Tests Without End

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Rob Pegoraro
Sunday, January 7, 2007

How is 2007 just like 2006 -- and 2005? Google's Gmail site is still in beta, as is Microsoft's Live Mail and the new version of Yahoo Mail.

Gmail ( http://gmail.com) has now spent 33 months in this testing phase, while Yahoo Mail ( http://mail.yahoo.com) and the Hotmail successor Live Mail ( http://mail.live.com) have lasted about 16 and 14 months, respectively.

Apparently, it now takes more time to finish developing a Web site than a Web browser -- or even an entire operating system. (Not even Windows Vista has undergone such a lengthy public audition.)

The fact that these three companies don't consider their free Web-mail sites housebroken doesn't mean that they don't want you to use them. They've got ads to sell. And time you spend reading and writing e-mail at these sites translates into money they can make off your activity.

The beta-testing status of these sites means each company's sales pitch often amounts to "trust us": Trust us that we'll add new features, fix the things that you dislike and catch up to whatever options our competitors already provide.

The developers of these Web-mail sites may have infinite patience, but you shouldn't. Choose a Web-mail site based on how it works today, not on how they say it'll work tomorrow, next month, next year or whenever they finally abandon the b-word.

By that standard, your choice should be easy: Use Gmail.

Google's Web-mail has the cleanest interface --dominated either by a simple vertical list of messages or the message you're reading or writing-- and loads the quickest. In comparison, Yahoo suffers a distracting delay after you log in, then wastes so much of the screen with a vertical ad banner that you must scroll sideways to read most messages; Live Mail works faster but has an equally inefficient layout that also requires frequent side-to-side scrolling.

Gmail is smarter about organizing messages, too. It groups related replies into "conversations" and lets you sort old e-mail by "tagging" it by topic -- in effect, filing it in two or more places at once. It takes a little getting used to, but this tagging system works much better for large volumes of mail than the conventional folders Yahoo and Live Mail provide.

Gmail's absurdly high quota -- you can squirrel away almost three gigabytes' worth of mail, compared to one each for Live Mail and Yahoo -- often draws attention. But unless you're a compulsive hoarder, you'll may never approach any service's storage limits.

If a fellow Gmail user is logged on at the same time as you, Gmail lets you sidestep the lag of e-mail altogether and open an instant-messaging chat session in the same browser window. (Yahoo and Microsoft say they will add similar features to their Web-mail services later on.)

Gmail is also the most compatible service around: If you use any modern browser -- Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari, Opera -- you get the same Gmail. Yahoo forces users of Safari and Opera to stick with its old interface.


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2007 The Washington Post Company