Bio & archive  |  Milbank Q&As  |   On Twitter   |    RSS Feed

Congressional Procession of Iraq Proposals Likely to Lead Nowhere

Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), center, with Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.), left, and Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.), speaks at a news conference about a resolution opposing the president's proposed troop increase in Iraq.
Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), center, with Sen. Joseph Biden (D-Del.), left, and Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.), speaks at a news conference about a resolution opposing the president's proposed troop increase in Iraq. (By Mark Wilson -- Getty Images)

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Dana Milbank
Thursday, January 18, 2007

"You cannot run a war by committee," Vice President Cheney said over the weekend.

Oh? Just watch them.

Lawmakers were introducing Iraq legislation at a mad pace yesterday, at one point in the afternoon scheduling news conferences in half-hour intervals. By the end of the day, they had issued more bills than Pepco.

Early risers saw Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) in the Senate television gallery introducing his proposal to limit U.S. troops in Iraq to 130,000 and to hold a vote on whether to reauthorize the war. Those who lingered until lunchtime could catch Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.) and other House liberals demanding a withdrawal of all U.S. forces from Iraq within six months.

Booking the Senate TV studio at 2:30 p.m. were Sens. Joseph Biden (D-Del.), Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.), with their own Iraq resolution. They had to vacate the room at 3 p.m. for the arrival of Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) and Evan Bayh (D-Ind.) and Rep. John McHugh (R-N.Y.); Clinton floated a variation of the Dodd plan. Minutes after that session, Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) issued a statement announcing legislation ordering a "phased redeployment" of U.S. troops from Iraq.

Even Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, who gave up his Senate seat, tried to get a piece of the action yesterday. His campaign sent out a fundraising appeal, asking: "Please chip in to help stop this escalation today."

The parade of lawmakers past the microphones lured a crowd to the Senate TV studio, where nearly 200 reporters and staffers squeezed four deep in the aisles; scores more were stuck outside. "I'm not going to have any senators in here before I have order in this room!" cried the gallery director.

But the excitement was misplaced. For all the bills introduced yesterday, none is likely to force President Bush to change course in Iraq. Proposals such as Biden's are "nonbinding" and others don't have enough votes to pass. "There is very little chance in the short run that we are going to pass any legislation," Clinton confided during her news conference. Asked to elaborate, she explained: "I can count."

If anything, the competing proposals could strengthen Bush's hand. Though largely united in opposition to Bush's plan, members of Congress, carved up by the presidential ambitions of Clinton, Obama, Dodd, Biden and others, can't unite around an alternative.

"Look," McHugh acknowledged in his appearance with Clinton and Bayh yesterday, "Congress right now has no effective role in this process."

Dodd, who last week declared his presidential bid on "Imus in the Morning," was the first to demonstrate McHugh's thesis. "It is time," he said at his morning news conference, to "offer meaningful action." He would require a new war authorization.

So would he enforce this by cutting off funding for the war?


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2007 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity