By Jeffrey H. Birnbaum
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
The National Federation of Independent Business is a bastion of Republicanism. Its staff has for decades been a farm team for GOP operatives and its campaign giving has been notably one-sided. Of all major lobbying organizations last year, NFIB gave the lowest share of its political action committee money to Democrats, a mere 8 percent.
But with Democrats now in charge on Capitol Hill, NFIB says it's changing. Its new president, Todd A. Stottlemyer, 43, wants to rebrand the nation's premier small-business lobby as "nonpartisan," and to prove his resolve he is talking extensively to Democrats and preparing to donate more to their coffers. "We're trying to reach out," he said. "It doesn't matter if you're an R or a D."
With many lobbying shops scooping up Democrats after last November's elections, Stottlemyer's effort may not seem that newsworthy. But for NFIB, it is huge. Stottlemyer's predecessor, Jack Faris, was viewed as a zealous partisan. A former executive director of the Republican National Finance Committee, Faris stopped talking even to pro-business Democrats in the House after he got involved in a shouting match over dinner with a group of Blue Dogs half a dozen years ago. NFIB, under Faris, also boasted of its role in defeating two of Congress's highest-ranking Democrats, House Speaker Thomas S. Foley (Wash.) and Senate Minority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (S.D.).
Now, however, Stottlemyer and his right-hand man, Executive Vice President Dan Danner, are working to rebuild the bridges that Faris burned. Stottlemyer, who declined to talk about Faris, has met with and offered to cooperate with such prominent Blue Dogs as Reps. Allen Boyd (Fla.) and John Tanner (Tenn.). In the Senate, he has visited moderates such as Blanche Lincoln (Ark.), Ben Nelson (Neb.) and Ken Salazar (Colo.), and asked them to join him on several issues, especially health care.
And in a move that the Faris-led NFIB would never have made, the organization did not list as one of its "key votes" of the year the House Democrats' recent push to increase the minimum wage. Small businesses despise few policies more, yet NFIB decided that the measure's success was preordained and that listing its defeat as a top priority would only antagonize the Democrats it now aspires to court.
One of those is Rep. Albert R. Wynn (Md.). Late last year, NFIB dispatched volunteers and a few of its lobbyists to help his campaign. Wynn is exactly the kind of middle-of-the-roader that NFIB now wants as an ally. He's also African American, and NFIB's long-term survival depends on attracting more minority members.
"We don't agree on everything," Wynn said of his new suitors. "But we've been able to find some common ground."
Boyd, like much of official Washington, remains dubious. "For the last 10 years, the NFIB was a difficult organization to deal with; it didn't play it straight," he said. "We'll have to see over a period of time how it conducts itself." But because of Stottlemyer's entreaties, Boyd said, "I'm a little optimistic." From a Democrat, that is huge.Ethics Gone Wild
As a good deed, the American Heart Association likes to conduct a mini-class in cardiopulmonary resuscitation for House and Senate staffers. It's a very popular course. But this year, new lobbying rules have gotten in the way.
Association lobbyists asked the House ethics committee if they could provide staffers with a box lunch, a CPR kit (consisting of a training DVD and an inflatable mannequin to practice on) and an hour-long lesson. The committee's lawyers said no to the lunch and the kit (as the lobbyists expected) -- and they also nixed the class. Under the new gift ban, it was deemed a thing of value that a lobbying group could no longer provide. The event has been canceled.
Capitol Hill has never been for the faint of heart. Now, even more so.Republican Hires of the Week
Lobbying is still bipartisan despite the Democratic takeover of Congress, with senior Republicans in big demand.
Asa Hutchinson, the former Arkansas congressman and undersecretary of homeland security, has returned to the law firm Venable. Jennifer Millerwise Dyck, former spokeswoman for Bush-Cheney '04 and the CIA, was hired by APCO Worldwide. John R. Russell IV, a former aide to ex-House speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), was brought in by Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal.
Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice added Tim S. McClain, former general counsel of the Veterans Affairs Department, to help its clients "obtain contracts with the VA and related agencies," a firm spokesman said.
Even all-Republican firms are expanding. Barbour Griffith & Rogers hired Stephen G. Rademaker, an ex-aide to former Senate majority leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), and Philip D. Zelikow, former counselor to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
Zelikow has for years served as a one-man think tank for Rice, advising her on Iraq and other policies. His role at the lobbying firm is undefined, though he won't be able to represent a foreign government for a year, said Ed Rogers, its chairman. "We'll see what evolves over time," said Rogers, a Zelikow friend.
But being under investigation is an impediment to a lobbying career for anyone, Republican or Democrat. Lundquist, Nethercutt & Griles split with former deputy interior secretary J. Steven Griles, who is the target of a corruption probe connected to disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff.The Gelman Update
Microsoft's deal with the House Democratic leadership is even sweeter than I reported last week. The software giant has loaned Matt Gelman, its chief House lobbyist, to the whip's office.
It turns out that the stint won't be long at all -- just 59 days -- and for a reason. If Gelman were to stay a congressional consultant for 60 days, he would be barred for a year from lobbying the folks he had just assisted.A New Idea
During a recent Web chat on washingtonpost.com, I received a fresh suggestion from out of the blue. Well, actually it came from Indianapolis -- or at least that was the city the correspondent listed.
Here it is: If you want to jam the revolving door between Congress and the outside world -- and discourage K Street from hiring former congressmen as lobbyists -- then deny a congressional pension to any former lawmaker who registers to lobby. A lawmaker can accept public funds in retirement via his pension, or he can make a living extracting public funds for clients as a lobbyist. But he shouldn't be allowed to do both. Whaddya think?
Send e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org.