Legislative Bickering, With YouTube Links

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Michael D. Shear
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, February 1, 2007

RICHMOND There must be something in the water.

When they're home, Virginia's lawmakers are an agreeable sort. They talk about compromise, working together and doing the people's business without much regard to party. That's the promise they make to voters every election.

When they go to Richmond, all bets are off. They start bickering. The bickering turns to arguing. And before you know it, they are fuming, calling one another names and stomping out of meetings.

This year, as in the past several, personal combativeness could spell disaster for the main legislative business at hand: a transportation financing plan.

It's probably no worse here than in some other legislatures. A certain amount of disagreement is natural and necessary to lawmaking. A lot gets done anyway, as evidenced by the hundreds of laws approved, most with a fair amount of agreement.

But all that paled in comparison to last year's signal failure to reach any sort of agreement on transportation, despite a session that stretched well into June and then reconvened for a fruitless week in September.

This year, the pattern is repeating, despite efforts by some legislative leaders.

Led by House Majority Leader H. Morgan Griffith (R-Salem) and Senate Majority Leader Walter A. Stosch (R-Henrico), a small group of Republican lawmakers spent December and early January in perfectly pleasant conversations to reach a transportation deal.

Now that the plan is out in the open, the sniping from the peanut gallery has begun -- and not with the pleasant tones that characterized pre-session talks.

An example is a bitter dispute about the proposal to raise taxes in Hampton Roads for highway projects. There appears to be disagreement about what the deal was: Either six of the 11 jurisdictions could vote to bind the entire group to higher taxes or they couldn't.

Lawmakers use "crazy" and "insane" to describe what they don't like about the idea. Some suggest that allowing six counties to control the fate of the others is akin to communism. That doesn't sit well with Republican proponents of the idea.

The best indication of the bickering can be seen on YouTube.com.


CONTINUED     1        >


More from Virginia

[The Presidential Field]

Blog: Virginia Politics

Here's a place to help you keep up with Virginia's overcaffeinated political culture.

Election Coverage

Election Coverage

Find out who is on the ballot in the next Virginia election.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company