A series of New York Times columns that explored whether a former Army scientist was responsible for the 2001 anthrax attacks were "cautiously worded" and asserted that the scientist could be innocent, a federal judge wrote in explaining why he decided to dismiss a lawsuit against the paper. -
Judge Explains Tossing Out Suit Against N.Y. Times
A series of New York Times columns that explored whether a former Army scientist was responsible for the 2001 anthrax attacks were "cautiously worded" and asserted that the scientist could be innocent, a federal judge wrote in explaining why he decided to dismiss a lawsuit against the paper.-
By Jerry Markon and Allan Lengel