washingtonpost.com
NEWS | POLITICS | OPINIONS | BUSINESS | LOCAL | SPORTS | ARTS & LIVING | GOING OUT GUIDE | JOBS | CARS | REAL ESTATE |SHOPPING
'); } //-->
Cheney Testimony Uncertain in Leak Case

By MATT APUZZO
The Associated Press
Tuesday, February 6, 2007; 5:25 PM

WASHINGTON -- Attorneys for former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby are backtracking on their plans to call Vice President Dick Cheney and Libby himself to testify in the CIA leak trial.

Libby's attorneys seemed certain in December when they announced that Cheney would testify at his former aide's perjury and obstruction trial.

But with prosecutors close to resting their case, attorneys are quietly backing away from that claim.

In documents filed in federal court this week, Libby's attorneys said Cheney was "potentially" a witness. Such hesitation is common but it's a big step back from attorney Theodore Wells' declaration: "We're calling the vice president."

Defense attorneys appeared even less committed to calling Libby. For months, they said Libby planned to testify and used that assertion to get access to a series of classified documents, such as his morning CIA briefing topics, so they could be entered into evidence.

"We emphasize at this point that Mr. Libby has not decided whether he will testify," lawyers wrote Monday night.

Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has raised the possibility that Libby was throwing the court a head fake _ promising to testify to win access to classified evidence, then quickly veering away from witness stand.

Libby is charged with lying and obstructing the investigation into the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity. He says he didn't lie but was so bogged down with national security issues that he forgot details about Plame.

He originally planned to testify about those national security issues to help bolster what has become known as the "memory defense." Testifying would be a risky move, however, because it would subject him to cross-examination by Fitzgerald, who has a reputation as a tough questioner.

Defense attorneys now say they should be allowed to present Libby's calendars and briefing topics even if Libby doesn't testify. Forcing him to take the stand would violate his right to a fair trial and his right against self-incrimination, attorneys wrote.

Libby's attorneys left open the possibility in court documents that Cheney and other White House officials _ rather than Libby _ could testify about his hectic and demanding schedule.

U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton has not ruled on the issue but has said attorneys could not raise the memory defense at closing without Libby's testimony.

"If Mr. Libby doesn't testify, there'll be no memory defense," Walton said.

© 2007 The Associated Press