washingtonpost.com > Business > Local Business
Page 2 of 2   <      

Convention Center Not Living Up to Lofty Goals

The Washington Convention Center, carrying an $850 million price tag, was the largest publicly financed building project in the District.
The Washington Convention Center, carrying an $850 million price tag, was the largest publicly financed building project in the District. (By Robert A. Reeder -- The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Hanbury and his supporters say that more people are walking through the convention center doors than expected and that more people stayed in hotels in 2005. But convention hotel bookings -- or, as people in the tourism trade put it, the number of heads on beds -- started to slip in 2006, a trend that looks as if it will continue in the next two years. The challenge the center faces is that its conventions include local residents who are not bringing new dollars to the city.

"In 2005, there was a lot of excitement about the new building, and we benefited because groups that rotate from East Coast to West Coast were coming our way," said Joe Stern, former senior director of sales at the Grand Hyatt hotel near the center. "But in '06, you're looking at book collectors and stamp collectors. These are wonderful organizations, but the economic impact is not the same as your medical organizations, which come in larger numbers and have greater impact."

The World Philatelic Exhibition, in fact, was the largest event last year, but, like the auto show, it brought fewer overnight visitors who feed the economy with money that wouldn't otherwise have been spent in the area.

The stamp show drew 80,000 visitors to see the first U.S. stamps, among other attractions. Convention center officials calculate that the show generated $83 million in spending, one-fifth of the $405 million that they say all conventioneers brought to the city last year. They got that number by multiplying the number of attendees by the industry standard of $1,039, which includes spending on a hotel, food, taxis and shopping. But critics say not everyone spends that much, especially those on a one-day trip. In any event, the 2006 level was below the kind of spending that was promised when the convention center was planned. Then, spending of $522 million in 2006 was projected.

But organizers of the show, who say attendance is hard to track because admission was free, estimate that half of their attendees didn't spend the night, with many traveling for the day from as far as Richmond and Philadelphia.

Unlike earlier, the center now is trying to accommodate price-sensitive groups, encouraging them to meet at off-peak summer and winter dates when discounts might be arranged.

"There have been pieces of business we were not successful with because we were not aggressive in concessions," Hanbury said. "We have to offer space at a discounted rate, and you have to have the rooms from the hotels and make sure the hotel package is competitive from a cost perspective."

Washington and other cities find conventioneers a compelling economic driver. They spend money and leave, so they don't require social services. Across the country, a boom in convention centers, built in the name of economic development, has made the always-competitive business of attracting big conventions even more brutal. An estimated 8 million square feet of space is expected to come online in the next few years, even as attendance at shows remains steady and demand for the space grows only modestly.

Critics say that for all its strengths, Washington isn't necessarily set up for hosting big shows. Washington doesn't have the central location of Chicago, the low rates of Atlanta, or the casinos and golf of Las Vegas.

The new 2.3 million-square-foot convention center -- double the size of the old one -- was supposed to attract bigger shows than its predecessor. Instead, though it has booked more shows, they tend to be smaller ones, with lower attendance, on average, than the old center had in its peak years, according to figures from Hanbury's group, which is responsible for bookings.

In 1993, the old convention center reported yearly attendance of 446,825; over its first three full years, the new center averaged 456,400. Center officials say, however, that the latest numbers are audited and that those from the 1990s were not.

Convention officials say the center's promises can still be kept. Reba Pittman Walker, chief executive and general manager of the Washington Convention Center Authority, which runs the center's daily operations, said she has hired a new and aggressive saleswoman to go after short-term business.

"We're working hard to make sure we remain a world-class destination for conventions," Walker said.

Staff writers Cecilia Kang and Thomas Heath contributed to this report.


<       2


More in Local Business

Brian Krebs

Local Blog

Post's local business staff keep you informed on local business news.

Post 200

Special Report

Our annual guide to the top businesses in the Washington, D.C. area.

Metro News

More News

More information about business news in the Washington region.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company