'Expert Centers' Give More Cost-Effective Cancer Care

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Monday, March 12, 2007; 12:00 AM

MONDAY, March 12 (HealthDay News) -- Expert centers with extensive experience in managing cancer are more costly, but they are also more cost-effective in managing ovarian cancer in the long-term, U.S. researchers report.

A team at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions in Baltimore looked at treatment efficacy, costs, and cost-effectiveness in hypothetical patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

They concluded that the overall cost of treating one patient was $50,652 at an expert center and $39,957 at a less experienced center.

Quality of life and survival as measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was much better at an expert center (5.12 QALYs vs. 2.33 QALYs), as was cost-effectiveness -- $9,893/QALY at an expert center and $17,149/QALY at a less experienced center.

The study authors concluded that using an expert center, "with a high proportion of patients undergoing optimal primary cytoreduction and receiving combined IP/IV chemotherapy, is cost-effective from the perspective of society compared to referral of patients to a less-experienced center."

The study is published in the April 15 issue of the journalCancer.

More information

The American Academy of Family Physicians explains cancer treatments.

SOURCE:Cancer, news release, March 12, 2007



HealthDay

© 2007 Scout News LLC. All rights reserved.