Silence on Contingency Planning
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
Regarding the March 14 letter by Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute about cost overruns in government:
As a contractor, I dread the situation where I have to brief my customers regarding a potential cost overrun on a project. As a project manager who does not have the extrasensory perception needed to predict the future, I try to put in place a contingency fund for cost overruns.
However, I am dissuaded from doing this while competing for a contract because my competition is not going to bid a contingency fund and because there are real pressures to hold costs down.
As an engineer, I know that my predictions will not be entirely correct and that I should budget for a management reserve.
I am sure that my customers face similar pressures. I would love to have an honest conversation with them about potential cost overruns and how to mitigate or fund them. But the system discourages that. Real procurement reform would include provision for those conversations.
JONATHAN ARNOLD
Leesburg
