Promoting a Way to Preserve Bits of Land

Two Trusts Spread the Word on Temporary Tax Breaks for Conservation Easements

Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 22, 2007; Page HO01

Greg Greisman's quaint stone house, a former 19th-century stable, sits off bumpy, gravelly Norris Lane, surrounded by Patapsco Valley State Park. Even in this old, woodsy enclave of eastern Howard County, Greisman worries about the pace of change and subdivisions sprouting along nearby Landing Road.

"You almost feel like nothing's safe," said Greisman, 48, who lives within view of the sprawling Victorian house where he grew up with his parents and four siblings. "If it's private property, it has the potential to be developed."

From the Extras

Want to learn more about your community? Experience events from our neighborhoods captured in photos, through the Washington Post Extras.

View this week's photos »

Archive: Previous weeks »

Greisman, a board member of the Rockburn Land Trust, has taken steps to permanently protect three undeveloped acres he owns and help his parents limit building on their 16 acres. He's hoping there are more people who think as he does about seeking lasting protection even for small parcels.

To that end, members of the Elkridge-based Rockburn trust and the Howard County Conservancy in Woodstock are publicizing a change in federal tax law that benefits those who donate conservation easements. They also are asking the county to help pay for placing easements on private parcels.

The two land trusts have identified 200 private parcels of 20 acres or less around Howard that might be good candidates and that don't qualify for the county's agricultural preservation program, which pays landowners up to $40,000 an acre for development rights.

"There's definitely conservation value in that," said Meg Schumacher, executive director of the Howard County Conservancy and a board member of the Rockburn Land Trust. "The growth that's been happening in Howard County has gotten local land trusts to that point."

Greisman owns a three-acre lot that he could have sold, perhaps for hundreds of thousands of dollars, for a homesite, but he chose to receive federal and state tax breaks by donating the development rights and placing the land under a permanent easement.

"I never bought it with the idea I was going to chop it up and sell it for profit," said Greisman, a construction contractor who has become an amateur historian of the land where he grew up and the home his parents purchased 45 years ago.

Greisman took advantage of a recent temporary change to federal tax law that Congress enacted in August to give greater tax benefits largely to farmers and ranchers who have significant land holdings but not much income. The changes enable those who donate development rights to deduct more from their adjusted gross income, reducing their taxable income by as much as half. They're allowed to take that deduction for up to 16 years, instead of six years, said Russ Shay, director of public policy for the Washington-based Land Trust Alliance.

"It has produced a surge of interest in donations. In some cases we know of donations that have been made because this has passed," he said.

The enhanced federal tax deductions apply only to easements donated this year and last, Shay said. Conservation groups are trying to persuade Congress to extend the tax benefit beyond 2007, realizing that a looming deadline may intimidate landowners.

"You're donating what may be your family's most valuable asset," Shay said. "It requires careful thinking and planning about the future of that land, the future of that family. It shouldn't be rushed."


CONTINUED     1        >

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company