At a Glance
Transit Bill Changes
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine (D) yesterday announced a series of changes to a statewide transportation plan approved last month by the General Assembly. Lawmakers will consider the revisions April 4. Among the proposals:
- About $1.1 billion a year to spend statewide on road and transit projects, instead of $1.3 billion.
- Borrowing would rise from $2.5 billion to $3 billion, over 10 years instead of eight years.
- In the plan's first year, the amount of general fund money would drop from $148 million to $64 million. Two-thirds of the general fund money would go for transit projects, increasing the amount of money the state spends on transit.
- About $400 million a year would go for Northern Virginia road and transit projects. The money would be raised from seven locally and regionally imposed taxes and fees. Six of nine local governments -- instead of all nine -- would have to vote to authorize the regional transportation authority to impose seven taxes and fees. A similar package for the Hampton Roads area would generate about $200 million a year.
- Local jurisdictions in Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads also would get the option of voting to impose three additional taxes and fees, including a tax on commercial real estate. If a local government approves those optional taxes, it could keep the money to spend on transportation needs within that jurisdiction.
- Counties would not be responsible for taking care of roads in new subdivisions.
- The state would expand the scope of transportation impact fees for by-right commercial and residential development in about 75 communities with growing population. The revenue from fees would be spent on road improvements that are needed because of the development.


![[The Presidential Field]](http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/09/17/GR2007091700670.gif)

