Pass the Piñata, Please: A Former President Regards the Current One

Jimmy Carter found plenty of reasons to disparage the president.
Jimmy Carter found plenty of reasons to disparage the president. (By Alex Wong -- Getty Images)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Dana Milbank
Thursday, April 5, 2007

So Iran was releasing the hostages and Jimmy Carter was giving a news conference.

No, C-SPAN wasn't airing reruns yesterday. The Islamic Republic really was releasing hostages (these were British sailors) and the wizened former president was fielding reporters' questions after receiving a prize at the National Press Club. But Carter enjoyed his inadvertently perfect timing.

"As a matter of fact, I went through the same ordeal earlier," he told a British questioner with a smile. "Four-hundred forty days instead of 16 days -- but all of our hostages came home safe and free, also."

The 82-year-old Carter -- he twice referred to his presidency as "ancient" -- had two items on the agenda as he accepted the Ridenhour "Courage Prize": rehabilitating his image after a book of his appeared to justify suicide bombings; and adding whatever blemishes he could to the current president's image.

The latter required little courage of the Courage Prize winner. President Bush's public support is within a few points of the 28 percent low Carter hit in the malaise of 1979. And Carter, viewed favorably by 69 percent of Americans in a February Gallup poll, is enjoying the sort of gauzy hindsight Americans generally give their former presidents.

Still, Carter showed his beleaguered successor little mercy.

On Alberto Gonzales: "The attorney general ought to step down, not particularly because he's committed any crimes, but because I think he's brought discredit and embarrassment on his boss, who apparently has put too much confidence in him."

On the firing of federal prosecutors: "Congress should issue subpoenas and require the people that gave President Bush advice -- or didn't inform him, either one, I don't know which -- about the firing of these prosecutors ought to be completely revealed."

On Bush's threat to veto a bill calling for a withdrawal from Iraq: "I think there have been infinitely more mistakes made . . . by this administration, so that's a minor mistake on the gamut of totality."

On Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's Middle East peace efforts: "Uncertain and wavering, but appreciated."

On Latin American policy: "You couldn't be appointed to major diplomatic posts unless you had a fervent and public animosity toward Castro."

On Hurricane Katrina: Bush "grossly violated" the principles Carter used to create FEMA. "Katrina was a disaster as far as FEMA was concerned, because it did not have a competent person in charge, it was not adequately financed . . . and it was under the still-struggling homeland security agency searching for its own role and its own identity."


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2007 The Washington Post Company