| Page 2 of 2 < |
Scientists Get Last Say in Climate Study
With such deadline problems, some countries _ especially China, Saudi Arabia and at times Russia and the United States _ were able to play hard ball.
China and Saudi Arabia wanted to lower the level of scientific confidence (from more than 90 percent to 80 percent) that the report had in a statement about current global warming effects and it looked like they would win because they wouldn't accept the original wording. That's when Rosenzweig protested and walked.
  Co-Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Martin Parry presents a report on climate change at the EU Charlemagne building in Brussels, Friday April 6, 2007. An international global warming conference approved a report on climate change Friday, chairman Rajendra Pachauri said, after a contentious marathon session that saw angry exchanges between diplomats and scientists who drafted the report. (AP Photo/Virginia Mayo) (Virginia Mayo - AP) Special Report
Read complete Post coverage on the science and politics surrounding the threat of human-induced climate change.
IN THE GREENHOUSE: Follow the Post series on the science behind confronting a changing climate. |
A U.S.-based compromise saved the day, avoiding any mention of scientific confidence.
A comparison of the original document, written by scientists, and the finished paper showed major reductions in forecasts for hunger and flooding victims. Instead of "hundreds of millions" of potential flood victims, the report said "many millions." A key mention of up to 120 million people at risk of hunger because of global warming was eliminated.
Yet, scientists have their fallback: a second summary that consists of 79 densely written, heavily footnoted pages.
The "technical summary," which will eventually be released to the public but was obtained by The Associated Press, will not be edited by diplomats. The technical summary, Rosenzweig said, contains "the real facts."
Some of its highlights, not included in the 23-page already-released summary:
_ "More than one sixth of the world population live in glacier- or snowmelt-fed river basins and will be affected by decrease of water volume." And depending on how much fossil fuels are burned in the future, "262-983 million people are likely to move into the water stressed-category" by 2050.
_ Global warming could increase the number of hungry in the world in 2080 by anywhere between 140 million and 1 billion, depending on how much greenhouse gas is emitted into the air over the next few decades.
_ "Overall a 2 to 3 fold increase of population to be flooded is expected by 2080."
_ Malaria, diarrhea diseases, dengue fever, tick-borne diseases, heat-related deaths will all rise with global warming. But in the United Kingdom, the drop in cold-related deaths will be bigger than the increase in heatstroke related deaths.
_ In eastern North America, depending on fossil fuel emissions, smog will increase and there would be a 4.5 percent increase in smog-related deaths.
_ Because global warming will hurt the poor more, there will be more "social equity" concerns and pressure for governments to do more.
___
On the Net:
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: http:/
The summary of the report: http:/
___
Associated Press writer Arthur Max contributed to this report.
