| Page 2 of 2 < |
Keeping a Reading Room of Their Own
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
That bothered regular users who said that documents leaving the agency would be buried at the National Archives and that it would be impossible to retrieve them quickly. Or the public would be forced to use the Freedom of Information Act, which requires government disclosure of certain documents, or pay for NHTSA research ($38.73 an hour plus copying fees).
"It's great they are archiving things, but that is not public access," said Tara Olivero, a lobbyist in the American Library Association's Washington office. The association wrote a letter to Transportation Secretary Mary Peters, saying the needs of researchers should take precedence.
Sean Kane, president of Safety Research & Strategies, a motor vehicle safety research, consulting and advocacy firm in Rehoboth, Mass., began hounding the agency in November to share its plans for the reading room. He mobilized other users and three professional library associations to get more information on its fate.
In a Jan. 5 letter to Margaret O'Brien, NHTSA's chief information officer, Kane said shipping records to the National Archives would harm public access and add to the agency's "missing documents" problem.
Kane and other researchers said the agency can't locate certain documents, imperiling their use in legal cases. Two databases haven't been functional since last year.
"Your plans to destroy or remove records deemed duplicative or old continues without input from the public or users who understand the content and their importance," the letter said.
The agency responded on March 16, saying a decision had been made to carve out space for the room. O'Brien said, "The issues raised by yourself and other safety partners should no longer be of concern." O'Brien added that the agency is taking steps to make more records available online.
Problem resolved? Hardly.
The user group wanted a sit-down meeting to flesh out exactly what the disposition of the files would be.
On April 2, members met with O'Brien. They came away skeptical, wondering if the agency had a plan for what would be preserved and if documents older than five years would be considered applicable to today's vehicle safety issues.
In response to questions about the specifics of the move, NHTSA said in a statement that it "will continue to operate a public reading room to provide relevant information on the agency's programs."
On April 12, the agency announced it would move everything in the current location to the new one. Said Rae Tyson, a NHTSA spokesman, "Things will only end up in archives if there isn't enough space."
Kane, still skeptical, won't consider the move complete without the old computerized databases, which are considered technologically outdated. "It's not the technology we are concerned about," he said. "It's the content."
Cindy Skrzycki is a regulatory columnist for Bloomberg News. She can be reached atcskrzycki@bloomberg.net.


