D.C. & the Vote: He Keeps the Faith

Friday, April 20, 2007; Page C01

The House voted yesterday to finally give the District voting rights, although the Senate has yet to consider the bill and President Bush has threatened to veto it as unconstitutional. Sterling Tucker, 83, is watching the matter closely. While Greater Washington Urban League president, he served as a member of the first appointed D.C. Council from 1969 to 1974. After home rule was granted in 1974, Tucker was chairman of the District's first elected council and was active in the push that led to congressional approval of the 1978 D.C. voting rights bill. That proposed constitutional amendment died after failing to win ratification by three-fourths of the states.

Tucker spoke yesterday about the long battle for District voting rights. These days, he heads a project to establish help centers in churches for people with HIV/AIDS and substance abuse problems.


Despite years of setbacks,
Despite years of setbacks, "I'm an optimist," says Sterling Tucker. (Lynne Duke - Twp)

-- Lynne Duke

Q. What really is on the table when we talk about voting rights for the District? Why has it been elusive?

A.It is a political fight, in my opinion, solely and completely. There is no philosophical justification for the people in the capital of the largest country in the free world not to be able to participate fully in their government, the electoral processes of their government.

Is it all about seats in Congress?

It's about seats in the Congress. It's about control over the nation's capital.

Why is that so important, the control?

Because it's the seat of government and the largest percentage of the Congress; they don't want to give the control of this city to local people. And certainly it was because we were a greatly majority black city. We still are, but not in the percentages we once were. They didn't have any confidence in our ability to lead, first of all. They didn't want to entrust that leadership to us.

So are you saying that if the District were a predominantly white locality that it would have had the vote years ago?

I believe so. Yes, I believe so.

So back then, what was your sense of how long it would take? Did you think there was momentum going and it was just a matter of a few years?


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2007 The Washington Post Company