Candidates Unite in Criticizing Bush

By Dan Balz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, April 27, 2007

ORANGEBURG, S.C., April 26 -- Democratic presidential candidates largely set aside their differences here Thursday and presented a united front of opposition to President Bush and his Iraq policy, urging the president not to veto newly passed legislation that sets a timetable for beginning the withdrawal of U.S. forces from the conflict.

In their first debate of the 2008 campaign, the Democrats showed some disagreement over the issue of cutting off funding for the war and vied with one another to demonstrate their willingness to retaliate swiftly if the United States is attacked by terrorists.

But they found common ground in accusing Bush of making the country less safe and damaging U.S. relations abroad through foreign policy and argued that the president is ignoring the will of the American people by refusing to shift course dramatically in Iraq.

"The American people have spoken," said Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.). "The Congress has voted, as of today, to end this war. And now we can only hope that the president will listen."

The 90-minute debate covered a wide range of issues, including health care, global climate change and the recent Supreme Court decision upholding a ban on a late term abortion procedure -- a decision critics have said could lay the foundation for overturning Roe v. Wade. Although public opinion shows support for the ban, the candidates uniformly criticized the court's decision.

The debate appeared unlikely to alter the shape of the Democratic race, which has divided along two tiers, with Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) and former senator John Edwards (N.C.) leading in polls and fundraising and well ahead of the other major candidates: Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (Del.), Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (Conn.) and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson. All more than held their own in the debate.

As the perceived front-runner, Clinton might have been seen as the likely target for attack, but the candidates largely avoided engaging one another directly -- and the format, which was often fast-paced and moved from topic to topic, offered no easy opportunities to do so.

The closest approximation to a direct engagement came when Edwards was asked whether he was specifically talking about Clinton when he has said the country wants a leader who is willing to admit mistakes.

"I think that's a question for the conscience of anybody who voted for this war," he said. "I mean, Senator Clinton and anyone else who voted for this war has to search themselves and decide whether they believe they've voted the right way."

Clinton, who has consistently been forced to defend her vote for the war along the campaign trail, responded by saying what she has said before: "I take responsibility for my vote. Obviously, I did as good a job I could at the time. It was a sincere vote based on the information available to me. And I've said many times that, if I knew then what I now know, I would not have voted that way."

Democrats have argued over Iraq through the early part of the campaign, but as congressional Democrats have moved to challenge Bush, the candidates have found their differences narrowed. But upcoming steps in the debate between Congress and the White House could expose more disagreement, as Thursday's debate showed.

Dodd was the lone major candidate to underscore his support for eventually cutting off funding for the war -- a position echoed with even more vigor by the two most outspoken opponents of the war in the field, Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (Ohio) and former senator Mike Gravel (Alaska).

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2007 The Washington Post Company