In The Loop Page   |   E-Mail Newsletter  Politics E-Mail   |    RSS   |   Live Politics Q & A

When Edwards Nips Senate, Dodd Bites Back

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
By Lois Romano
Thursday, May 3, 2007

At least one Senate Democrat is mad as hell and isn't going to take it anymore.

Less than 24 hours after former senator John Edwards (D-N.C.) released an ad calling on Congress to stand its ground against President Bush in the ongoing fight for the funding of the war in Iraq, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) put out a statement blasting his former colleague.

"As Senator Dodd was the first candidate to support the Reid-Feingold measure, we agree that Democrats in the Senate should stand up to a president who stubbornly refuses to change his failed policy in Iraq," Dodd spokeswoman Christy Setzer told our colleague Chris Cillizza. "We wish that Senator Edwards was still in the Senate for this important fight."

Dodd is the only Democrat running for president who has signed on to the legislation co-sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) that would set a firm timetable not only for withdrawing troops but also for cutting off funding for the war.

When informed of Dodd's remarks, Eric Schultz, a spokesman for Edwards, responded: "John Edwards has called for the immediate withdrawal of 40,000 to 50,000 troops followed by an orderly withdrawal of 12 to 18 months," adding that the plan goes beyond proposals set forth in Reid-Feingold.

It's important to note that Dodd trails Edwards -- as well as Sens. Barack Obama (Ill.) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) -- in state and national polling on the Democratic presidential race. In other words, Dodd needs to take his shots when he can get them.

But his response speaks to a deep frustration among Democratic senators -- especially those running for president in 2008 -- that Edwards, as a private citizen, can lob rhetorical grenades at his Senate rivals.

Why You Want to Be President, in 100 Words or Less

If the Democrats' 90-minute presidential debate last week is any guide, the 10 GOP candidates meeting in California tonight for a similar show may need to figure out how to make the most out of the five minutes they get to speak.

Some of the Democratic presidential hopefuls were not happy with the little face time they were afforded as NBC host Brian Williams tried to juggle eight of them on stage in South Carolina.

An analysis of the forum by the National Journal's Hotline shows that Clinton bested her peers with 12 minutes of talk time -- a real gusher compared with her colleague Dodd, who eked out only five minutes. The only contender to fare worse was former senator Mike Gravel of Alaska, who scraped by with only four minutes of exposure.

Tonight's Republican debate at the Ronald Reagan library in California, hosted by Nancy Reagan, will be moderated by MSNBC's Chris Matthews. Philip Alongi, NBC's executive producer for political programming, said in an interview that the network spends days developing questions for candidates to showcase positions important to each. In addition, he said, producers digitally track throughout the program how much time the candidates are getting and adjust the questioning accordingly.

But the nature of the process often allows the top-tier candidates more time.


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2007 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity