House Backs New Reins On Student Lenders
Thursday, May 10, 2007
The House voted overwhelmingly yesterday to bar student loan companies from offering perks and financial incentives to universities to drum up business, the first federal legislative response this year to mounting criticism of the $85 billion-a-year industry.
The bipartisan bill, approved by a 413 to 3 vote, would increase federal regulation of student loan companies. The industry has come under scrutiny from federal and state investigators over its financial ties with schools and government officials.
The measure drew support from advocates of students and from some key players in the loan industry -- a rare overlap of views for the interest groups.
"This legislation would protect students and families from the corrupt practices and abuses that for too long have been allowed to run rampant within the student loan industry," said Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), chairman of the House education committee and the bill's lead sponsor.
The Senate is likely to approve a similar measure soon, congressional aides said. The Bush administration is "generally supportive" of the legislation, said spokesman Scott Stanzel.
Passage of the bill, the Student Loan Sunshine Act, came as Education Secretary Margaret Spellings prepared to face questions today from Miller's committee over the student loan controversy and other matters. Critics say the administration has been lax in its oversight of the industry, a charge Spellings rejects.
The bipartisan support for tighter control of the industry reflects the growing political potency of the issue since an investigation by New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo revealed alleged conflicts of interest among university financial aid officers and questionable business practices by lenders. The nation's four largest lending companies and 22 schools have agreed to abide by a code of conduct, developed by Cuomo's office, that bans many of the most controversial practices.
The legislation passed by the House would forbid lenders to offer gifts to financial aid officials, to provide staff members for school financial aid offices or to pay schools for steering student business their way. The measure also would require schools to disclose financial relationships with loan companies.
An industry trade group, America's Student Loan Providers, issued a statement endorsing the legislation's core principles. Kevin Bruns, the group's executive director, said the rules would "help guide student loan marketing so that questionable practices are eliminated."
But some in the industry said they were worried that parts of the bill go too far. Shelly Repp, general counsel for the National Council of Higher Education Loan Programs, said a portion of the bill that would prohibit university officials from sitting on lender advisory councils would make it difficult for loan companies to get advice from schools.
Proponents said the legislation would increase the transparency of the student loan system, giving students better information for borrowing decisions that can affect their finances long after they graduate.
Several lawmakers and student advocates, though, said the legislation did not address what they see as the biggest problem: the billions of dollars a year in federal subsidies given to private lenders instead of students.