Kenneth Harney
Columns by Harney  |   RSS Feeds RSS Feed   |   Business Headlines   |   Business Index

A 'No-Fee' Mortgage That Might Be for Real

Saturday, May 12, 2007; Page F01

Home loan industry competitors are searching for hidden gimmicks, but Bank of America insists that its "no-fee mortgage plus" plan announced this week delivers exactly what the name implies -- without raising interest rates to applicants.

The new program comes with none of the traditional mortgage and settlement charges -- application fee, appraisal fee, credit, underwriting, processing, title insurance, title search, private mortgage insurance, flood certification or closing fees -- and offers "competitive" interest rates.

On a typical loan, these fees can amount to 3 percent to 5 percent of the mortgage amount, depending on location, and run into the thousands of dollars.

Bank of America says it is so certain that its no-fee deal stacks up well against competitors' rate-plus-fee offerings that it is urging applicants to comparison-shop, with Bank of America's quote in hand, before making a final commitment. If an applicant who is approved by the bank for a no-fee loan chooses to close with a competitor, the bank promises to pay that applicant $250.

The no-fee package also comes with a 25-days-or-fewer closing guarantee. And the bank says that if the closing occurs after the deadline, it will pay the applicant's first month's worth of principal and interest.

Is this all for real? How can a lender eat thousands of dollars in costs without somehow slipping them into the deal somewhere? So-called zero-cost refinancings are readily available in the market, but they typically include the origination and settlement charges in the note rate -- bumping it up by an extra one-quarter of 1 percent or more.

Other lenders have offered "guaranteed mortgage package" quotes of rates and fees with no additional charges allowed between application and settlement. But those packages still charge borrowers most of the traditional lender and closing costs.

Floyd Robinson, president of consumer real estate for Bank of America, said the company is able to offer "a true no-fee mortgage product" in part because of its sheer size -- $1.5 trillion in total assets, 55 million banking customers nationwide, and a nearly $350 billion portfolio of first and second home mortgages. That size allows it to create cost efficiencies and take over certain responsibilities that smaller institutions cannot.

For instance, the no-fee program allows down payments as small as 5 percent for conventional mortgages up to $417,000 -- and even lower for certain "jumbo" loans up to $3 million -- without private mortgage insurance premiums. The bank intends to keep all or most of the no-fee loans in its portfolio, Robinson said in an interview.

"We are the investor, and we assume the risk" of defaults or foreclosures on loans with low down payments. Rather than requiring borrowers to pay monthly mortgage insurance premiums, the bank is self-insuring the risk and charging customers nothing for the service.

Sensitive to any suggestion that the new program loads nominally waived fees into the interest rate, Robinson said "our rates are very competitive" with other lenders who charge all the usual fees. Competing brokers or lenders might be able to quote slightly lower note rates, he said, but when shoppers look at the truth-in-lending annual percentage rate disclosure -- where all the loan costs are factored into the effective rate being charged for the loan -- "we are confident that we will have the best deal."

If not, "we'll pay you, no questions asked."


CONTINUED     1        >

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company