| Page 3 of 3 < |
Tom Ricks's Inbox
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
It is my view from direct dealing with the current senior leadership of this Administration . . . and the Congress . . . and the Armed Forces -- that Mr Rumsfeld is viewed by many as a ruthless and mostly self-serving official who dominated the policy process to the ultimate detriment of the nation.
He claimed credit when it was not his due -- and adroitly evaded responsibility for his failures. Finally, by the end -- it was my belief that he was disingenuous at best when confronted by the media for his failures. This is as polite as I can be to characterize his deliberate denial of evidence that contradicted his public mis-statements of the facts.
The new Secretary Bob Gates is going to make a serious contribution to getting us out of this dangerous situation in the short time remaining. He is brilliant and has common sense -- and is an official of great integrity.
Dr Rice is no longer anchored by the constraints of Mr Rumsfeld -- and now plays a pivotal role in a new aggressive public diplomacy. Dave Petraeus and Ryan Crocker will jointly play a creative leadership role in Iraq -- minus the widely hated interference which came from Mr Rumsfeld. The White House Chief-of-staff and the National Security Advisor will now have a chance to open a dialogue with Congress to possibly get some sort of bi-partisan solution to the disaster that Mr Rumsfeld left us.
Again -- I understand and respect your sense of loyalty -- but I think Mr Rumsfeld's leadership failure as the Secretary of Defense got the nation and the Armed Forces in a very dangerous position.
Would also suggest that your very pointed emails -- such as the one to Joe Galloway and now me -- which defend his disasterous tenure . . . are very much part of the public record and debate.
Appreciate the chance to respond to your views. Best wishes.
Barry McCaffrey
* * *
Tom Ricks is The Post's military correspondent. This feature aims to give readers a snapshot of the conversations about Iraq, Afghanistan and other matters that play out in Ricks's e-mail inbox. Have an interesting document? Send it to TheInbox@washpost.com


