Showdown in Odessa

Teaching the Bible in Texas public schools

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Saturday, May 26, 2007

WHEN THE newly elected school board in Odessa, Tex., announced that it would require public schools to offer a Bible course elective, many townspeople cried hallelujah. But last week some other residents, aided by the American Civil Liberties Union and the People for the American Way Foundation, sued the school district for violating the First Amendment.

Currently 8 percent of public schools nationwide offer courses on the Bible. The Supreme Court has deemed these classes constitutional so long as they "present knowledge, but neither promote nor disparage belief." Odessa residents are thus challenging the course's execution and not its existence. The district chose the more controversial of two leading Bible class curricula: a course designed by the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools, a group run by a veritable Who's Who of conservative Christian leaders. Council board member and actor Chuck Norris has described this curriculum as the "first step to get God back into your public school."

The creators of the curriculum, which is used in 37 states, have been accused of promoting sectarian beliefs. The course calls the Catholic belief of transubstantiation, for example, a "warped" understanding of a metaphor. Scholars have questioned the academic integrity of the curriculum, too, accusing its creators of plagiarism and historical claims unsupported by scholarly research. In 1998, it was challenged in a Florida court case and found unconstitutional. A Liberty Legal Institute lawyer for the Odessa district says that was "an earlier version" of the curriculum and that Odessa students using the updated curriculum have not complained.

Biblical understanding is not only constitutional; it's also essential to the study of literature, art, history and politics. But keeping school systems from indoctrinating, rather than educating, students on Scripture can be difficult. The fact that Odessa schools may be carelessly implementing their new Bible course doesn't bode well for their willingness to teach the Bible in an objective, scholarly, nonsectarian fashion. Given that the Texas legislature is considering a bill to bring Bible courses such as Odessa's to schools statewide, we hope that this lawsuit will force schools to think more critically about teaching this important but sensitive subject.



© 2007 The Washington Post Company