Meat, Eggs and Seafood From China
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
In his May 28 letter, "Checking Chinese Exports," Richard Raymond claimed to "correct misinformation" in Harold Meyerson's May 23 op-ed about food safety. But the official food import records of the Commerce Department suggest it is Mr. Raymond who is spreading misinformation.
Mr. Raymond, an undersecretary of agriculture for food safety, ignored what Mr. Meyerson actually wrote -- that few of our food imports are inspected and many are intentionally mislabeled to avoid even theoretical regulation. Rather, Mr. Raymond asserted: "Currently, China does not export any meat, poultry or egg products to the United States."
But official U.S. import data indicate that, even ignoring mislabeling, Mr. Raymond's claim is not true.
For the first three months of 2007, the records show U.S. imports from China of $3,942,000 in meat, particularly frog meat but also rabbit, deer and poultry, including edible offal. The United States imported $481,000 of bird eggs in shells and another $20,000 of bird eggs not in shells. The records show imports from China of an additional $19,348,000 in non-fish animal parts, such as guts, bladders and stomachs. U.S. imports from China of seafood and fish are officially reported as $433,354,000 during the first three months of 2007.
As an economist who has followed international trade closely for many years, I find that Mr. Raymond's letter raises the serious question of whether the Agriculture Department's food safety division is truly so far out of the information loop or whether its concern is to provide safety to interests other than American consumers.
CHARLES W. MCMILLION
Washington


