Barry Pushes Housing Measures
Rent-Control Plan Among D.C. Bills
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Friday, June 1, 2007
D.C. Council member Marion Barry is pushing an ambitious legislative package to address the city's lack of affordable housing, including a controversial rent-control bill that would protect low-income residents from losing their homes.
Barry (D-Ward 8), chairman of the Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, is sponsoring five measures, which will be discussed at a public hearing Monday.
The bills include one that would require the D.C. Housing Authority to create a rent-to-own plan that would give some residents of public housing an option to buy their rental properties. Another would provide $5,000 housing grants for math, science and special education teachers if they commit to working in D.C. public schools for five years.
Several council members have co-sponsored the legislation, but Barry is the lone sponsor of the rent-control bill. "That's going to be the tough one, but I'm going to forge ahead," he said.
Under the bill, buildings constructed before 1975 that have four units or fewer, including single-family homes, would be subject to current rent-control laws. Annual rent increases would be restricted to 2 percent plus inflation with a cap of 10 percent.
Those dwellings are exempt from rent-control laws approved last year after tense negotiations with tenant advocates and building owners. That legislation marked the first overhaul of the city's rent-control laws in 20 years.
Officials with the Apartment and Office Building Association of Metropolitan Washington, which represents landlords who lease buildings with larger numbers of units, said they will oppose the legislation.
Single-family homes make up about 25 percent of the city's rental housing stock, said Shaun Pharr, senior vice president of government affairs for the association. "There's no data, but anecdotally, it's logical to assume that it's smaller owners who bought one or two houses as an investment," he said.
Overall, Pharr said, rent control contributes to less affordable housing for people who need it, because wealthier tenants abuse the system. "Unfortunately, it's inefficient because it's not means-based," he said. "You have a lot of beneficiaries of rent control who do not need it."
The D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute, a think tank that studies District tax issues, found that U.S. Census data show that the city lost 7,000 occupied rental units from 2000 to 2005.
In the District, about 40,000 families are on a Housing Authority waiting list for low-income housing, Barry said.
"We support all of Barry's bills," said Jim McGrath, chairman of the D.C. Tenants Advocacy Coalition. "We have seen a lot of landlords squeezing out from under rent control. It's absurd. A landlord is a landlord is a landlord."


