Correction to This Article
The number of viewers for local TV newscasts during May was incorrectly stated in an article in the June 3 Arts section. The correct figure is 657,000, not 562,000, reflecting a 10-year decline of 25 percent.
Page 3 of 3   <      

Tonight's Big Story: News Viewers Missing!

The local late-news audience has dropped 25 percent since 1997.
The local late-news audience has dropped 25 percent since 1997. (Istockphoto.com)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

"The fact is, local newscasts aren't adapted to that," says Allen, the author of "News Is People," a history of the local TV news business. "Stations might want to look inside their own newscasts and ask if the way they're covering stories in a way that fits with how modern viewers watch TV. People no longer sit there and watch 20 little stories at a time."

Local executives, though, say the news has been gradually evolving. Local news is faster and harder than it was a decade or more ago, says WJLA's Lord, with more live and "breaking" stories. Gone, he says, are the softer human-interest stories, such as "the local chainsaw artist who is carving a sculpture in his back yard. You're not going to see that anymore. All of our newscasts are much more immediate. It's a combination of changing [viewer] tastes and competitive forces. People want immediacy."

WUSA's Horlick thinks that localism is the key competitive advantage for stations amid intensified competition and changing technology.

"Yahoo and AOL can't compete with pure local broadcasters, or newspapers," he says. They just don't have the knowledge of the community and the resources to cover it."

Horlick echoes something that his counterpart at WRC, Michael Jack, says: The future isn't just local TV news, but news delivered in any form the viewer wants it -- via the Internet, an iPod, a PDA or even via two-way digital TV (just as soon as someone invents it).

"Over the next few years, we're going to see a blurring of the TV and the computer and the mobile device," Horlick says. "We've got to be able to deliver information over multiple devices. Our job today is to get our skill sets in order so that when we reach that tipping point, we're ready. . . .

"We're not just talking about a different kind of TV news. We're talking about a cultural revolution in the information business."

Falling ratings? No problem. Just look to the future: "Do I think the pendulum will swing back to us?" Horlick asks. "Yes, I certainly do."

Staff writer John Maynard contributed to this report.


<          3


© 2007 The Washington Post Company