ESCORT CASE
Phone Records in Contention
Attorneys Argue Over Release of the 'Little Black Book'
Deborah Jeane Palfrey, the alleged Washington madam, answers questions at a Georgetown restaurant this month. She was not in court yesterday.
(By Katherine Frey -- The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
Ever since she burst into the media spotlight earlier this year, the alleged "D.C. madam" has made it clear that she is not alone: She is accompanied by 46 pounds of phone records.
In U.S. District Court yesterday, attorneys spent more than an hour arguing about the value of those records -- the possibly incriminating, perhaps no-longer-quite-so-titillating remnants of Deborah Jeane Palfrey's escort business.
At issue is a temporary restraining order that U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler placed on Palfrey and her civil attorney last month, barring them from releasing any more of the records containing former clients' numbers to news organizations or the public. Palfrey wants the ban lifted; prosecutors want it to remain in place.
"This is the defendant's little black book," Assistant U.S. Attorney William Cowden said in court yesterday, arguing that the records were an asset of an illegal enterprise and thus forfeitable under federal law. "It looks like the reasons she kept it was so she could come back someday and blackmail."
But Preston Burton, Palfrey's court-appointed criminal attorney, countered that there was "nothing intrinsically valuable" about the records, except for about $15 in scrap paper.
"We're talking about a phone bill. This is not the secret formula for Coca-Cola," he said. " . . . What I'm talking about is a client's right to use her own information."
Kessler did not rule, and in her questions to the attorneys, stressed she was "playing devil's advocate."
"Aren't the phone numbers of customers the phone numbers of unindicted co-conspirators that we're protecting here?" she asked Cowden at one point.
Palfrey, who says she is indigent, said she needs reporters or groups to help her mine the records for potential witnesses. The defendant, who lives in California, was not present at yesterday's hearing.








