Qualcomm Chips Banned in New U.S. Phones

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Susan Decker and Peter J. Brennan
Bloomberg News
Friday, June 8, 2007

New cellphones sold in the United States will not be allowed to use chips from Qualcomm, after a trade agency found the products infringe a patent owned by rival Broadcom.

Semiconductors made by Qualcomm, a maker of chips for cellphones, can continue to be sold in handsets already on the market, the U.S. International Trade Commission said yesterday. The decision must be reviewed by President Bush and U.S. Trade Representative Susan Schwab.

The trade commission, in a 4 to 2 vote, said it will order customs officials to block imports of some handsets using Qualcomm chips that provide high-speed Internet access on cellphones. The company also will be banned from bringing the semiconductors into the United States for testing, the commission said in a statement.

The commission found that while excluding all phones would have hurt the U.S. economy, "the exemption for previously imported models sufficiently ameliorates this impact," it said.

"It appears minor to Qualcomm rather than anything that would really hurt it in the market," said Michael Cohen, an analyst at Pacific American Securities, who owns shares of San Diego-based Qualcomm. "This doesn't affect phones already in the marketplace." Broadcom is based in Irvine, Calif.

The four biggest phone-service providers -- AT&T, Verizon Wireless, Sprint Nextel and T-Mobile -- and handset manufacturers told the commission that a ban would hurt billions of dollars of investments and future profit.

In December, the commission upheld an administrative law judge's finding of infringement. Yesterday's decision dealt with the remedy.



More in Technology

Brian Krebs

Security Fix

Brian Krebs on how to protect yourself from the latest online security threats.

Cecilia Kang

Post Tech Blog

The Post's Cecilia Kang on the FCC, net neutrality and more tech policy.

Rob Pegoraro

Faster Forward

Tech columnist Rob Pegoraro blogs about gadgets, software, tech glitches and more.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company