We Don't Pick on Israel
|
TOOLBOX
   Resize
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Who's Blogging  |
In his June 25 op-ed, "A Shadow on the Human Rights Movement," Jackson Diehl mischaracterized Human Rights Watch's position regarding the U.N. Human Rights Council. We have repeatedly criticized the council's selective treatment of Israel, including in a statement last week. While we stand by that criticism, we also believe that more can be done for human rights by working to improve the council than by writing it off. The council created an experts group that developed a road map that can be used to hold Sudan accountable for ongoing violations. It will also scrutinize the records of all U.N. members, not just Israel's, in a country-by-country review just established. The council's independent experts are already investigating abuses not only by Sudan but also by North Korea and Burma.
States committed to human rights can put the council on a better track by holding poor performers such as India and South Africa responsible, rather than launching empty criticisms at the council as a whole. And improving the council requires dedicating resources to make it stronger, including appointing a senior official to work on the council in Geneva and in important capitals.
PEGGY HICKS
Global Advocacy Director
Human Rights Watch
New York
