Climate Change
A NEW Special Report

The Climate Agenda

Explore news and resources & debate policy with our expert panel. Full Report »
Page 2 of 2   <      

Power Plant Still Battling to Stay Open

Mary Harris stands on the balcony of her Alexandria apartment, which overlooks Mirant's Potomac River power plant. Neighbors want the plant closed. (By David A. Fahrenthold -- The Washington Post)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

"It's a Truman-era plant, and it's probably right now somewhere in the late '70s" in terms of pollution-control technology, said Eric Schaeffer of the nonprofit Environmental Integrity Project. One major piece of technology that's missing are "scrubbers," machines that remove pollutants such as sulfur dioxide. Mirant said it doesn't have space to install scrubbers, so instead it has used another method.

Overall, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency officials said the Potomac plant complies with all applicable rules. They said its pollution load would put it in the middle ranks of coal plants across the country. In the region, five plants in the Maryland suburbs produce more power than the Potomac plant and more sulfur dioxide.

Environmentalists said the Potomac plant's location makes it especially worrisome: Other coal plants are far from urban centers, with fewer people nearby to breathe their exhaust.

Concerns about those effects have convinced opponents, including Alexandria officials, that the plant must be overhauled with modern pollution controls or simply shut down.

"Basically, we say, 'Clean up or get out,' " said Ernie Lehmann, a board member of a local chapter of the Sierra Club.

Opponents have tried lawsuits and zoning to close the plant, but it has survived. It was closed for a time in 2005, after an analysis showed that its emissions could exceed limits. The plant reopened and is operating at a reduced capacity, using only three of its five boilers, to limit emissions.

Today will bring a new round in the fight. Virginia's Air Pollution Control Board will meet at 4 p.m. at the Nannie J. Lee Recreation Center, 1108 Jefferson St., to consider a plan by Mirant that would blow the plant's exhaust higher into the atmosphere, dispersing it a greater distance. Mirant says that would allow the plant to burn more coal without harming neighborhoods.

One thing will have changed from previous battles. Before, the Department of Energy had ordered that the plant remain open to provide backup power for the District during an emergency. The plant is no longer needed for that purpose because two lines were built this summer to connect the city with the regional power grid.


<       2


More Climate Change News

Green | Science. Policy. Living

Green: Science. Policy. Living.

News, features, and opinions on enviromental policy, the science of climate change, and tools to live a green life.

In the Greenhouse

Special Report

The Post's series on the science behind climate change.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company