Pentagon Chief Talks of Further Iraq Troop Cuts
Saturday, September 15, 2007
One day after President Bush announced a limited drawdown of U.S. troops from Iraq by next summer, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said yesterday that it might be possible to reduce U.S. forces there further over the course of next year, down to approximately 100,000 troops by the end of 2008.
Gates's comments followed a White House report yesterday concluding that the Iraqi government has not made satisfactory progress on several political and security benchmarks. In a congressionally mandated assessment, the administration found only modest improvements since an interim report in July.
In a prime-time Thursday night speech, Bush endorsed the recommendation of Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, to remove 5,700 troops by Christmas and five additional combat brigades by next summer, reducing the troop level to between 130,000 and 140,000. But Petraeus told Congress this week that he will not recommend further cuts until March.
Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, Gates said he hopes that in March, Petraeus "will be able to say that he thinks that the pace of drawdowns can continue at the same rate in the second half of the year as in the first half of the year." Asked if such reductions would mean that U.S. troops would number about 100,000 by the end of 2008, Gates replied: "That would be the math."
Gates spokesman Geoff Morrell later emphasized that the defense secretary's comments were his "personal views" and did not represent administration policy or a formal military plan. But Gates's statements, delivered in his first Washington news conference in two months, underscored the continuing battle inside the administration and on Capitol Hill over the size of the U.S. troop presence in Iraq. Leading Democrats said yesterday that Bush's proposed cuts do not go far enough in reshaping the U.S. mission.
After judging two months ago that the Iraqi government had made satisfactory progress on eight of 18 congressionally mandated benchmarks, the White House yesterday noted "satisfactory progress" on one additional objective, emphasizing a recent agreement among Iraq's senior political leaders to move forward on a plan allowing former Baathists to return to civic life. The report did not note that the lack of a quorum in Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's cabinet -- currently being boycotted by 15 of 37 ministers -- has prevented further consideration of the measure.
Bush and other officials had once described the 18 benchmarks as critical to judging conditions in Iraq. But as it became clear that the Iraqis would miss many of the goals, the White House has increasingly sought to redefine progress, pointing to local political reconciliation in places such as Anbar province as a more telling sign that the Iraqis can eventually build a functioning state. The 28-page White House report made it clear that the administration does not want to revisit the benchmark issue, saying only that officials will offer a more general assessment of conditions in Iraq in March.
After lunching with troops at the Marine base in Quantico, the president issued another plea for Democrats and others to abandon their opposition to his Iraq policy. "Now's the chance for us to come together as a nation," he said. "Some of us who believe security was paramount were on opposite sides of the debate, where people said we just simply need to bring our troops home. Well, now we've got security in the right direction, and we are bringing our troops home."
Vice President Cheney also offered an upbeat assessment of conditions in Iraq. "Tough work lies ahead," Cheney told the troops at MacDill Air Force Base in Florida. "But the evidence from a theater of war 6,000 miles away, in my mind, is beyond question: The troop surge has achieved some solid results, and in a relatively short period of time."
Democrats reacted to the latest benchmark report with a shrug yesterday. "All it does is point out the failure," said Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. "You don't even need to go to the benchmarks to realize what an abject failure this policy has been."
Petraeus told The Washington Post on Thursday that he hopes to reach "sustainable security" in Iraq by June 2009, but he did not provide an estimate of how large a U.S. force would remain involved in backing up Iraqi forces then.
Gates's comments may fill in that blank, to a degree; they could also foster expectations for Petraeus to recommend further cuts in six months.