| Page 2 of 2 < |
Fairfax Race Stirs Power Debate
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
The current form of government, widely used by cities and counties, has deep political roots in Virginia. The state exerts tight control over local government, based on the 140-year-old Dillon Rule that limits localities to powers expressly granted by Richmond lawmakers. Any major changes in Fairfax government would almost certainly require approval by the General Assembly.
The question of changing the system has surfaced periodically. In 1993, board Chairman Thomas M. Davis III (R), attempting to make good on a campaign promise to "reinvent" county government, formed a committee to examine alternatives.
The panel, headed by former governor Linwood Holton (R), discarded the concept of an elected head of government with full executive powers. But only by a narrow 9 to 7 vote did it reject a subcommittee's recommendation for an "enhanced" chairmanship, with the power to submit a budget and hire and fire the county executive and deputies, with the consent of the board.
The Holton panel recommended other changes, including prohibitions on outside employment for supervisors and tying their salary to that of a circuit court judge in recognition of the post's full-time status. Neither idea received serious consideration from supervisors, wary of a voter backlash against a huge pay increase.
Davis supported the idea of a stronger chairman and said last week that he believes the county would benefit from the change.
"I feel more strongly than ever, we've got a dinosaur in Fairfax County," he said. "You've got to have someone in charge at the end of the day."
The two major candidates for chairman say they don't need enhanced powers.
Connolly said he can effectively pursue his agenda -- which has included affordable housing and transportation improvements -- through persuasion. He also said that making the chairman an operating executive would create needless tensions with the legislative branch, the Board of Supervisors.
Connolly's ceremonial status hasn't prevented him from taking an expansive view of his accomplishments, such as saying he "led the fight" for Dulles rail. Though he has been an active player in the project, it has been a mammoth, decades-long undertaking involving multiple Virginia governors, state and federal agencies and private contractors.
Defenders of the status quo say it is difficult to argue that an elected-executive system produces a demonstrably superior product. Montgomery's ability to manage growth and development has come into sharp question in recent years, as evidenced by building-height and design irregularities at Clarksburg Town Center.
In Prince George's County, the Maryland state prosecutor's office is looking into the distribution of grants from the National Harbor Community Outreach Committee, underwritten by the developer of the commercial and residential project. In April, The Post reported that more than $181,000 was given to organizations with ties to committee members or to County Executive Jack B. Johnson (D). Also, during his reelection campaign last summer, Johnson delivered at least $10,000 in grants to politically influential churches that had not applied for the funds.
"Just because Maryland has a model doesn't make it better," Connolly said
Baise, a D.C. lawyer and former Nixon-era Justice Department and EPA official who represents corporate and agricultural clients in environmental cases, compares the Fairfax post to chairmanship of a private board of directors. He opposes the idea of a chairman with executive powers.
"I don't think it's suitable," he said. "You don't have the board members running The Washington Post Company," he said. "Board members are supposed to be board members and it seems to me that that works reasonably well in the corporate structure. I think you get better overall governance with professional people."
Baise added, however, that board members need to meet their oversight responsibilities, and he says that hasn't always happened in Fairfax. He cites the handling of the Dulles rail project, in which staff members signed confidentiality agreements for access to information about the contract between the state, the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority and Dulles Transit Partners, the private consortium that would build the rail extension. Confidentiality agreements would prevent staff members from sharing information with the board.
"It seemed that there was a breakdown there," Baise said. "Staff should have advised the board on what they were doing." Connolly and other board members have said they were fully briefed on the contract by staff.
For more about Fairfax County elections, go tohttp:/


![[The Presidential Field]](http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/09/17/GR2007091700670.gif)




