| Page 2 of 2 < |
Va. Budget Shortfall May Mean Layoffs
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
"If we begin the practice of utilizing the state's rainy day fund during a non-recessionary period, then we run the risk of establishing a bad and undesirable precedent that suggests we can overspend taxpayer resources without consequence," said Del. Vincent H. Callahan Jr. (R-Fairfax), the outgoing chairman of the House Appropriations Committee.
About half of the shortfall, which followed years of robust economic growth, can be attributed to a slowing housing market. But Callahan said Kaine is directly responsible for the other half.
Callahan said the Kaine administration underestimated by $175 million how many people would take advantage of land preservation tax credits. It also miscalculated how much interest the state would earn from the general fund, reducing revenue by $120 million, he said.
"Without these two errors, the shortfall would be too minimal to allow for a withdrawal from the rainy day fund," Callahan said.
The issue is becoming entangled in this fall's elections for control of the General Assembly.
Jay Donahue, a Democrat challenging Del. Thomas Davis Rust (R-Fairfax), issued a statement saying the General Assembly should have done its own analysis before approving the budget.
"The short answer is the House of Delegates didn't do their job. . . . They failed to plan correctly and double-check their work," Donahue said.
House Republicans, meanwhile, are squabbling with Kaine over how quickly the governor has to inform them of potential budget cuts.
Since its 2004 struggle with then-Gov. Mark R. Warner (D) over budget cuts, the General Assembly has twice approved language that says the governor has to send the assembly written plans detailing possible budget cuts within five business days after an agency sends such plans to the administration.
Kaine and Warner vetoed that budget language, saying the General Assembly did not have the authority to insert it. Lawmakers maintain that the vetoes were invalid because the governors did not have the authority to veto budget language without vetoing the entire budget.
On Friday, Kaine received a detailed plan from each agency outlining possible budget cuts. House Republicans said Monday that the administration will be violating the law if legislators do not receive that information by Thursday.
"This is the law. Why aren't you all following the law?" asked Del. Phillip A. Hamilton (R-Newport News). "There is no ambiguity. Five days is five days."
Kaine spokesman Kevin Hall said of the Republicans, "It is unfortunate they continue to play politics while the governor and his finance team are making hard choices to balance the budget."
House Majority Leader H. Morgan Griffith (R-Salem) countered that the General Assembly needs the unfiltered list of possible agency cuts because lawmakers may have to cut the budget further if they decide not to tap the rainy day fund.
"I think we are at a point where we can tighten our belts and be okay without dipping into our long-term savings," Griffith said.


![[The Presidential Field]](http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2007/09/17/GR2007091700670.gif)

