Page 2 of 2   <      

O'Malley Plans Major Revamp Of Income Taxes

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Under O'Malley's plan, Montgomery residents in the highest bracket would pay a combined state-county rate of 9.7 percent, which County Executive Isiah Leggett (D) said yesterday is "not acceptable."

"We're prepared to do our share and certainly help, but we also have to be fair," he said. "This is asking an awful, awful lot from the taxpayers of Montgomery County."

In 2005, nearly half of the returns from people earning more than $500,000 in Maryland were from Montgomery, according to the comptroller's office.

The combined rate of 9.7 percent would also exceed the current top marginal rates in the region. In Washington, the top rate is 8.5 percent; in Virginia, 5.75 percent; and in Delaware, 5.95 percent.

Maryland would not be alone in imposing higher rates on upper-income earners. California, for example, applies a rate of 10.3 percent on incomes of more than $1 million.

And the opposition from Montgomery is not universal. Past efforts to make Maryland's tax code more progressive have been initiated by Montgomery lawmakers, whose liberal sensibilities are sometimes at odds with the economic interests of some of their constituents.

"Will there be concerns? Undoubtedly, and we're certainly going to have to look at them," said Sen. Richard S. Madaleno Jr. (D-Montgomery). "But I think the majority of the delegation supports the governor and the concept of what he's trying to do here, which is make the tax code more progressive."

Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. (D-Calvert) said all areas will have to sacrifice for the state to close the projected $1.7 billion shortfall in the budget for the 2009 fiscal year that starts in July.

"Every jurisdiction needs to contribute something," Miller said.

House Speaker Michael E. Busch (D-Anne Arundel) said that he is willing to hear concerns from all parts of the state. But, he said, "to the governor's credit, he's trying to come up with a comprehensive plan that takes into account the concerns of middle-income and working-class families."

Maryland's income tax structure has undergone few changes since 1967, when the U.S. median family income was $7,933 a year. One of the last significant changes started a decade ago, when the top marginal rate was gradually cut from 5 percent to 4.75 percent. That move is considered a source of Maryland's current budget woes.

O'Malley said that he will publicly announce other components of his plan this week and next. An event touting the property tax cut is scheduled this morning in Howard County.

O'Malley aides said yesterday that the reduction in the property tax will disproportionately benefit residents of Montgomery and other wealthy jurisdictions.

O'Malley is pushing legislative leaders to convene for a special session on his plan by early November.

Staff writer Ann E. Marimow contributed to this report.


<       2


More from Maryland

Blog: Maryland Moment

Blog: Md. Politics

Slots for MOCO? Taxes to balance the budget? Get the latest updates here.

Election Coverage

Election Coverage

Find out who is on the ballot in the next Virginia election.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company