Who Knew? Susan Collins Sure Didn't
Comparing the Senate to middle school -- not a terribly big stretch -- the two senators from Maine, Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins, would be those girls who endlessly compete by mimicking each other. They wouldn't be BFFs (best friends forever), but they might hang out in the same clique, take the same classes and keep close tabs on each other.
As grown-ups, Snowe and Collins are moderate Republicans who though, as far as we know, don't call every morning to see what the other is wearing, do usually coordinate votes on key issues. That is why Collins was steaming mad yesterday when Snowe, without warning, switched her vote to side with Democrats to restore habeas corpus rights for terrorism suspects.
Snowe had initially backed Republican leaders by voting "nay" on the procedural motion to force a final vote. But once it became clear that the GOP had more than enough votes to win, Snowe switched her vote to "yea."
Snowe apparently did not inform her leadership of the switch, according to aides and senators familiar with the decision. Therefore, Collins never got the message, leaving her all alone.
Collins, who is facing a potentially tough reelection battle next fall against Rep. Tom Allen (D-Maine), an antiwar liberal, was visibly angry, according to eyewitnesses in the chamber's press gallery. She paced around the floor, confronting several members of the leadership.
"There was just a miscommunication there," explained Sen. Trent Lott (Miss.), the Republican whip in charge of counting votes. Lott said that although Collins and Snowe almost always try to vote similarly on key issues, "sometimes they get their signals crossed."
Washingtonpost.com's partisan unity database shows that Snowe has managed to be ever so slightly more liberal in her voting record. She has sided with a majority of GOP colleagues on 62.5 percent of roll-call votes this year, compared with 66.7 percent for Collins.
Collins's office had little to say about the vote switch, other than to maintain that she was not a flip-flopper. "She voted the same way the last time the issue came up," spokeswoman Jen Burita said in an e-mail. "She did not discuss her vote with Sen. Snowe and we don't have any idea why Sen. Snowe switched her vote."
Snowe spokesman John Gentzel said: "Senator Snowe ultimately decided on this procedural motion simply to allow for additional debate on the issue. I don't know if she had conversations with leadership."
For those who can't get enough of political scandals, pay close attention to local and federal court dockets. Three big trials and hearings are on tap within one week of one other.
The continuing saga of Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) will have its most pivotal moment on Wednesday. That is when, in Hennepin County District Court, a judge will hear Craig's attorneys make their case to withdraw his Aug. 8 guilty plea to disorderly conduct in the bathroom at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.
Craig, who surprised colleagues by returning to work this week, has said he intends to resign Sept. 30 if he cannot quash the plea. Court officials have said the hearing may last only 30 minutes but have not indicated how long a ruling will take. Even if he gets the plea withdrawn and gets a full trial in the local Minnesota court, Craig still has to contend with his colleagues on the Senate ethics committee.