Political Browser: The Post's Daily Guide to Politics on the Web MORE »

Bush, Democrats Duel On Children's Insurance

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Jennifer Loven
Associated Press
Sunday, September 23, 2007

President Bush again called Democrats "irresponsible" yesterday for pushing an expansion he opposes to a children's health insurance program.

"Democrats in Congress have decided to pass a bill they know will be vetoed," Bush said in his weekly radio address, repeating an accusation he made earlier in the week. "Members of Congress are risking health coverage for poor children purely to make a political point."

In the Democrats' response, also broadcast yesterday, Pennsylvania Gov. Edward G. Rendell (D) turned the tables on the president, saying that if Bush does not sign the bill, 15 states will have no funding left for the program by the end of the month, and thousands of children will lose their health-care coverage.

"The administration has tried to turn this into a partisan issue and has threatened to veto. The health of our children is far too important for partisan politics as usual," Rendell said. "If the administration is serious about solving our health-care crisis, it should be expanding, not cutting back, this program, which has made private health insurance affordable for millions of children."

At issue is the State Children's Health Insurance Program, a program that subsidizes health coverage for low-income people, mostly children, in families who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid but not enough to afford private coverage. Federal funding expires Sept. 30.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers announced a proposal Friday that would add $35 billion over five years to the program, adding 4 million people to the 6.6 million already participating. It would be financed by raising the federal cigarette tax by 61 cents to $1 per pack.

The idea is overwhelmingly supported by Congress's majority Democrats, who scheduled it for a vote Tuesday in the House. It has substantial Republican support, as well.

But Bush has promised a veto, saying the measure is too costly, unacceptably raises taxes, extends government-covered insurance to children in families who can afford private coverage, and smacks of a move toward completely federalized health care. He has asked Congress to pass a simple extension of the current program while debate continues, saying it is children who will suffer if they do not.

"Our goal should be to move children who have no health insurance to private coverage -- not to move children who already have private health insurance to government coverage," Bush said.

The bill's backers say their goal is to cover more of the millions of uninsured children. The bill would provide financial incentives for states to cover their lowest-income children first, they said.



More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

Latest Politics Blog Updates

© 2007 The Washington Post Company