The Rail Alternative
TOOLBOX   Resize
 Save/Share +
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Post editorials about airways congestion -- most recently, "The Crowded Skies," Sept. 10 -- have omitted one big part of the solution: Divert travel off planes by investing in rail to provide fast, frequent service in more markets.
Many states long have been poised to help with such investments if federal matching grants materialize. Some states, such as California, Wisconsin, Washington and North Carolina, already have partnered with Amtrak without federal funds, but most future improvements require an end to the anti-rail bias in federal funding.
The National Association of Railroad Passengers has offered a proposal that, simply by upgrading existing and already planned rail infrastructure, could bring passenger trains to 103 more metropolitan areas and more options to people who already have some train service.
ROSS B. CAPON
Executive Director
National Association
of Railroad Passengers
Washington
