The Tax-Exodus Bogeyman

Scare Tactics in the Debate Over the O'Malley Plan

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Sunday, September 30, 2007

Fearmongers aplenty are setting up shop as Maryland gears up for the grand debate over Gov. Martin O'Malley's plan to erase the state's budget shortfall.

The governor's proposals have encouraged Marylanders eager for progressive solutions that can raise needed revenue -- and, at the same time, reform a Maryland tax structure that winks at wealthy and big-time corporations.

These same proposals are deeply offending lawmakers for whom such wealthy interests are some of their most prized constituents.

The chairwoman of Montgomery County's Senate delegation has challenged the governor's proposal to raise the top state income tax rate from the current 4.75 percent to 6.5 percent on income over $500,000. The hike, she said, would drive affluent Montgomery County residents into Virginia, where taxes are lower.

"Northern Virginia is a very appealing place," Sen. Rona E. Kramer (D) stated, "and it's right across the river."

Business lobbyists are making a similar case against the governor's proposal to shut the most gaping corporate tax loopholes. Taking that course, the Maryland Chamber of Commerce charges, would force big companies to "simply shift their jobs and investments to other states."

In other words, residents of Maryland, be afraid of the governor's plan. Be very afraid.

Afraid of what? Let's get serious here. The governor's modest tax hike on high incomes will cost a couple making three-quarters of a million dollars a bit over $7,000, or less than 1 percent of that couple's annual income.

Put this $7,000 in perspective. America's richest 1 percent -- taxpayers with 2007 incomes higher than $450,000 -- will this year save an average of $52,000 on their federal taxes, thanks to Bush administration tax cuts enacted over the past half-dozen years.

The bottom line: Marylanders in the nation's richest 1 percent, even with the adoption of the governor's proposal, would still be $45,000 a year ahead of where they would be if they were still paying taxes at pre-George W. Bush rates. Does anyone really believe that these families will leave Maryland because these savings should be $7,000 higher? We have wealthy Maryland families that spend more than $7,000 a year on landscaping.

In real life, studies show, people choose where to live based on a wide range of quality-of-life factors that go far beyond their tax bills. Most of Maryland's affluent understand that their state and local governments need adequate revenue to provide quality-of-life services.

Corporations, by the same token, also look at a variety of factors, not just tax policy, when they decide where to locate. And on the corporate tax front, meanwhile, the governor has proposed a modest tax increase. But more important, he wants corporations to meet their tax responsibilities.


CONTINUED     1           >


More Washington Post Opinions

PostPartisan

Post Partisan

Quick takes from The Post's opinion writers.

Washington Sketch

Washington Sketch

Dana Milbank writes about political theater in the capital.

Tom Toles

Tom Toles

See his latest editorial cartoon.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company