Devaluing Prayer, and Freedom
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
The saga of New Jersey high school football coach Marcus Borden ["Case Tests Boundaries of Prayer in Sports," news story, Oct. 7] raises some difficult questions about the meaning of prayer. Before a game, Borden invites his players to kneel and bow their heads, a practice that most people would conclude is prayer. Borden, in a lawsuit against his employer, argues that this practice is purely secular.
In a huge number of faith traditions, worshipers kneel or bow their heads to engage in prayer. If the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit agrees with Borden's position, the court will seriously undermine the sanctity of prayer, stripping it of religious meaning.
The Court of Appeals should call this practice what it really is: prayer.
And when public school coaches or teachers lead their students in prayer, it demolishes the wall between church and state. The United States is the most religiously diverse country in the world. The only way to ensure that all of our faith traditions are respected is to forbid the government from imposing one religion on all of us.
C. WELTON GADDY
President
Interfaith Alliance
Washington
The Interfaith Alliance submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in this case.


