A RESPONSE POST-KATRINA
President to Tour Southern California To Gauge Fire Efforts
Thursday, October 25, 2007
President Bush embarks this morning on a tour of the wildfires ravaging California to showcase his administration's ability to respond better to natural disasters than it did after Hurricane Katrina two years ago. Yesterday, he pronounced the federal government's actions "well-coordinated" after a Cabinet meeting to discuss the crisis.
Federal and state emergency managers say, however, that the two disasters can hardly be compared. Katrina's floods and winds wreaked havoc on a far larger scale. California's local responders lead the nation in training and coordination, while Louisiana's rank near the bottom. And the Federal Emergency Management Agency's responsibilities for battling wildfires are far more limited than its role in dealing with hurricane damage.
"FEMA is not getting a real test in putting direct federal assets on the ground," said George W. Foresman, undersecretary of preparedness for the Department of Homeland Security in 2005 and 2006.
By contrast, even some Democrats say Bush has mastered the political response to the wildfires, a not-insignificant achievement that both fosters hope from the victims and spurs close coordination with local officials, starting with California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R).
The White House announced a presidential emergency declaration for California within minutes of receiving the final paperwork from FEMA about 3:30 a.m. Tuesday. That morning, he deployed FEMA Administrator R. David Paulison and Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff to the state. He followed up yesterday by issuing a more comprehensive disaster declaration and by presiding at a national emergency video teleconference and Cabinet meeting.
"Certainly from a political point of view, they're taking pretty quick action here," said former Clinton chief of staff Leon E. Panetta, a former California congressman who testified to a 2006 state commission on catastrophe preparedness.
Mark Ghilarducci, a former senior federal and California emergency management official who now works as vice president of a consulting firm led by Clinton FEMA director James Lee Witt, said he hopes that Bush will leave a legacy like that of his father, George H.W. Bush. The senior Bush oversaw a response to Hurricane Andrew in South Florida in 1992 that was heavily criticized but led to changes under his successor.
"I'm happy to see they've taken a page out of James Lee Witt's playbook," Ghilarducci said. "I hope a page has been turned and all future responses are as good."
Still, the relatively smooth response to this season's devastating wildfires says more about California's efforts over the years than the federal government's, several veteran federal, state and local emergency managers said.
While Katrina's vast floods and winds covered an area the size of Britain at 90,000 square miles, fires in seven California counties blackened about 700 square miles as of yesterday -- a footprint one-third smaller than wildfires burned there four years ago. The number of homes destroyed was about 1 percent of the 300,000 made uninhabitable by Katrina, and financial losses were less than 2 percent, based on initial estimates, comparable to the damage caused by wildfires in Oakland in 1991 and in Southern California in 2003.
Local officials have choreographed the largest evacuation in Golden State history, with estimates of the people instructed to leave their homes at 351,000. But many began returning yesterday. Katrina prompted the evacuation of 1.1 million people, and 500,000 were still displaced after four months.
As White House spokeswoman Dana M. Perino said, "These fires are not the same disaster that we had in Katrina."