Page 2 of 2   <      

The Power and Perils of Headlines

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Page design figures prominently in every headline. Is it a dreaded one-column headline with larger type (among the hardest to write) or a multicolumn headline with lots of leeway? Perhaps a label is needed to set the scene -- or a deck, one term used for the secondary headline below the main headline. Decks, most often used on Page 1, allow a headline writer more space to tell the story.

The headline on an Oct. 19 editorial criticizing President Bush's comments on Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin, puzzled some readers and displeased others. The editorial took exception to a remark by Bush, who questioned "whether or not it's possible to reprogram the kind of basic Russian DNA, which is a centralized authority." The main headline was "Russia's DNA" and the deck was "And President Bush's CYA."

Diana Bruce Eskin of the District wrote: "I read the editorial twice to see if I had missed something . . . that would give me a clue what 'CYA' stood for." She asked two men and "both said 'CYA' meant 'cover your [butt]!' " Then she asked a friend and members of her adult study group at Metropolitan Memorial United Methodist Church. "This was the result: Men who understood what CYA meant: 7 out of 8 polled; women who understood: 2 out of 7 . . . Two men with PhDs understood CYA and two women with PhDs did not."

The editorial and headline were written by Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt; editorial writers often write their own headlines. Editorial copy editor Tom Rowe raised the question of taste; Rinehart took it to Deputy Editorial Page Editor Jackson Diehl, who was in charge in Hiatt's absence. Diehl let the headline stand. Hiatt said, "I realized it was pushing it, but I thought the word had entered the general vocabulary sufficiently to be on the permissible side of the line." Diehl thought that it was clever and that CYA had "come into the vernacular."

Rowe was right. This headline violated two basic rules. It wasn't easily understandable or explained. It also was in bad taste.

Headlines on commentary differ from straight news and features. Rinehart has three rules: "Headlines on editorials should give the reader important clues to what the editorial says without making it utterly unnecessary to read the editorial. A second is that on our type-heavy pages, headlines should be written short to give the page a little air. A third is that for op-ed headlines in particular, the best writing approach is to sort of hit it at an angle -- we want the headlines to have the same subtlety and wit that columns have -- a kind of Zen brevity."

My grandfather, Sam Williams, couldn't read, but he believed newspapers were important. He subscribed to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, which arrived days late at his ranch in Schleicher County, Texas. My mother read him headlines so he could decide whether he wanted to hear the whole story. What was true almost a hundred years ago is true today. Headlines sell stories.

Deborah Howell can be reached at 202-334-7582 or atombudsman@washpost.com.


<       2


© 2007 The Washington Post Company