» This Story:Read +| Comments
Page 2 of 2   <      

Turning Novel Ideas Into Inhabitable Worlds

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

"Contrary to what most people assume," he said, "one's politics as a novelist have nothing to do with the societies, parties and groups to which one might belong, or even dedication to any political cause. A novelist's politics arise from his imagination -- his ability to imagine himself as someone else." This "makes him a spokesman for those who cannot speak for themselves, whose anger is never heard and whose words are suppressed."

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

A bit later, Pamuk made the context for all this more specific.

"Now we are approaching the subject of the East-West question," he said. "Journalists are exceedingly fond of it. But when I see the connotations it carries in some parts of the Western press, I'm inclined to think that it would be better not to speak of the East-West question at all. Because most of the time it carries an assumption that the poor countries of the East should defer to everything the West and the United States might happen to propose."

Pamuk was brought up in a well-to-do Turkish family whose intellectual and cultural inclinations were toward Europe, but that doesn't mean he can't understand his country's traditionalists. He talked about Turkey's early-20th-century impulse toward "westernizing reforms" as something that sent a message to many that their culture was "defective."

This message "gives rise to a very deep and confused emotion: shame," he said. "Whenever a people feels deeply humiliated, we can expect to see a proud nationalism rising to the surface."

Pamuk thinks novels are our best hope to understand the unique history of other peoples.

"Obviously we cannot hope to come to grips with matters this deep merely by reading newspapers and magazines or by watching television," he said.

Near the end of his talk, the novelist spoke of "a vision that I entertain from time to time." Sometimes, he said, he tries to "conjure up one by one a multitude of readers hidden away in corners, nestled in their armchairs with their novels."

Then, before his eyes, "thousands, tens of thousands of readers will take shape, stretching far and wide, across the streets of the city, and as they read, they dream the author's dream, imagine his heroes into being and see his world. So now these readers, like the author himself, try to imagine 'the other' -- they are putting themselves in another's place."

By the end of this vision, Pamuk said, he sees his novel readers as "an entire nation . . . imagining itself into being."


<       2


» This Story:Read +| Comments

Find More Reviews and Features in Books

War stripped of all its glory

In "The Good Soldiers," Pulitzer Prize winning reporter David Finkel faced an unenviable task in writing his on-the-ground account of war in Iraq.

Who do men say that I am?

Though too cursory to work as an intro to the Gospels, Mary Gordon's "Reading Jesus" should appeal to anyone who wants to wrestle with the problems and paradoxes of the New Testament.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company