A Call for Better Adoption Safeguards
TOOLBOX   Resize
 Save/Share +
COMMENT
 Discussion Policy
 CLOSE
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
In her Nov. 4 op-ed "Slamming the Door on Adoption," Elizabeth Bartholet spoke compassionately and convincingly for homeless children abroad as she made her case for international adoptions.
But one could also emphasize that the ballooning demand for children by well-to-do parents in the developed world can go hand in hand with corruption, compromised adoption regulations and the disenfranchisement of birth parents in the weak institutional settings of the adoptees' countries.
As a resource-rich adoptive parent in the United States who was raised in an area of India with many destitute families, I care deeply that both the rich and the poor are treated fairly. Until advocates of international adoption make an equally pressing case for increased scrutiny in the impoverished countries where most adoptees come from, opinions such as Ms. Bartholet's may be viewed as lobbying efforts for an already mobilized community of wealthy prospective adoptive parents.
SHARMILA CHOUDHURY
Washington
