» This Story:Read +| Comments
Page 3 of 5   <       >

The Rules for a Fair Fight

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

"Hair, husbands and hemlines," says Duerst-Lahti.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Which leads us to . . .

Managing the husband

This is a particular issue for Clinton, of course. But prominent spouses can be an issue for any political candidate because they tend to draw the spotlight away from the person running for office. (See: Teresa Heinz.) It just so happens that, as Joan Hoff, former president of the Center for the Study of the Presidency, points out, female candidates are more likely to have spouses who are at least as successful and prominent as they are.

And then there's the larger cultural discomfort of a man subordinated. Pratt says when she served as mayor, people tended to assume her husband had a larger role in the decision-making of her office than he did.

Cut to the academic: "It's because we think of men as autonomous and we think of women as heteronomous. Women are always connected; men stand alone," Duerst-Lahti says.

In a best-case scenario, the spouse himself recognizes the need to maintain a supporting role. Bill Orr, who once described himself as "a former male chauvinist pig," has said he had to come around to the idea of his wife, Kay, running for governor of Nebraska. But she ran and won -- serving from 1987 to 1991 -- and he decided he needed to raise money to redecorate the mansion.

He put out a "First Gentleman's Cookbook."

Be prepared to be a symbol.

In the same way that a smaller statistical sample means that each person polled carries more weight, women on the national stage are made to stand in for other women. They are studied for what they tell us about the state of contemporary womanhood.

During her husband's first term, Clinton told the Wall Street Journal: "A friend told me I've turned into a gender Rorschach test. People are not really often reacting to me so much as they are reacting to their own lives and the transitions they are going through."

Everything is symbolic. Everything is closely studied for its intent and its implications. Which is why women can get offended if a male candidate calls his female opponent "ma'am" a lot, as Bob Ehrlich did to Kathleen Kennedy Townsend in a 2002 gubernatorial debate in Maryland.


<          3           >


» This Story:Read +| Comments

More From Style

[Second Glance]

Blogs

Style writers riff on music, comics and other topics.

[advice]

Advice

Get words of wisdom from Carolyn Hax, Ask Amy, Miss Manners and more.

[Cover Stories]

Reliable Source

Columnists Amy Argetsinger and Roxanne Roberts dish dirt on D.C.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company