Weighing In, Shula Has Heavy Words

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Michael Wilbon
Thursday, November 8, 2007

This isn't a case of the media belittling the New England Patriots, or some loose-cannon coach like Jerry Glanville sounding off for the fun of needling. Sometimes the messenger is so respected that the criticism has greater legitimacy, and such was the case when former Miami Dolphins coach Don Shula said that, if the Patriots remain undefeated, their perfect record should carry an asterisk in the NFL record books.

The worst you can say about Shula, who has won more games than any coach in NFL history, is that his criticism of the Patriots could be interpreted as self-serving, since it's his 1972 Dolphins who would be replaced in the record book by the Patriots. Even considering that, criticism from Shula is, and should be, a conversation starter, and it has certainly done that in New England, where the Patriots predictably fired back yesterday.

In case you missed it, Shula told the New York Daily News the other day: "The Spygate thing has diminished what [the Patriots] have accomplished. You would hate to have that attached to your accomplishments. They've got it. [New England Coach Bill] Belichick was fined $500,000, the team was fined $250,000 and they lost a first-round draft choice. That tells you the seriousness or significance of what they found [through spying]. I guess you got the same thing as putting an asterisk by Barry Bonds's home run record. . . . The sad thing is Tom Brady looks so good, it doesn't look like he needs any help."

Asked if he was upset by Shula's comments, Patriots linebacker Tedy Bruschi said: "If someone questions your integrity . . . if someone questions the organization you've been a part of ever since you walked into the league, would it upset you? So, yes, it does upset me. . . . If they want to keep saying those things, maybe we just need to play a little bit harder."

You know what team is going to be affected most by the Patriots' reaction to Shula? The Dolphins. Not the '72 Dolphins, but today's winless Dolphins, who have to travel to New England on the next-to-last week of the season to face an already bloodthirsty Patriots team enraged even more by Shula. Put me down for 62 points for the Patriots that afternoon.

The bigger story here, though, is that there are those in the coaching fraternity who think Spygate is a stain on Belichick's record. Shula apparently thinks the stain is indelible. Tony Dungy also made the comparison to Barry Bonds. These aren't C-list coaches. Dungy, whose Indianapolis Colts won the last Super Bowl, is beloved by his peers. Shula is revered. If there were a Mount Rushmore of NFL coaches, Shula would be on it (probably with George Halas, Vince Lombardi and Paul Brown).

Shula's teams won two Super Bowls and 328 regular season games. You know who's close to Shula? Nobody alive. Marty Schottenheimer has 200. The great Chuck Noll has 193. Bill Parcells has 172. Shula has the r¿sum¿ to weigh in on virtually anything that involves coaching in the NFL.

More important to this latest flap is that Shula's long career has rarely involved petty disputes. There are those who'll suggest he sounds like a bitter old man in criticizing Belichick. But Shula has been gracious beyond fault, certainly more so than Belichick. And Shula has a certain authority, even integrity, that gives what he says gravity. So, while I do not think a 19-0 record should carry an asterisk, I do find Shula's statements worth hearing. There's a resentment directed at the Patriots from within the profession that is impossible to ignore.

Of course, this is directed at Belichick specifically more than the Patriots as a team. And Belichick seems to know it, which is the primary reason he is intent on pounding every single opponent into the ground. It's become an irresistible story line, the biggest and perhaps even the only important one in the NFL this season, from the first mention of Spygate in Week 1.

Most recently, we've seen Belichick barely clasp Dungy's hand at the end of the Patriots' victory Sunday in Indianapolis. Rosevelt Colvin, a veteran Patriots linebacker, says these little mini-dramas have prevented people from getting to know the real Belichick. And to a great degree, Colvin is right.

I've had two social interactions with Belichick, one lengthy. And away from the field he comes off as funny, opinionated, literate, interested, curious and somewhat charming. He even looks different away from football, dressing in Armani or other tailored garments that are 180 degrees opposite to what we see on Sunday or when he's addressing reporters. It's as if Belichick puts on that hideous sweatshirt (one he would never wear if the NFL powers were smart enough to stop trying to push team merchandise and allow coaches to wear suits) and becomes some kind of super-coach in need of a personality transplant.

Who knows if Belichick needs to adopt that personality to be successful? What we're finding out is that his fraternity brothers, men incredibly reluctant to criticize one of their own, find Spygate objectionable.

And while many of us presumed this string of blowout victories would hush most criticism of Spygate, Shula's comments suggest there are some those who think cheating should be punished severely and not be easily dismissed -- no matter what you do subsequently.

I doubt Shula is the only old coach who believes this. And even if he is, being the greatest winner gives him an automatic and deserved forum. The coach seems aware of the complexity of calling the Patriots cheaters, but quickly added that cheating is something they don't seem to need to do.

"You have to acknowledge what they accomplished," Shula said of New England's three Super Bowl victories, "but I don't know how you disregard Spygate. It's there. It happened. You don't know what was on those tapes and how much it helped. I think the commissioner just wanted it to go away."

But it's not going away as quickly as many thought -- certainly not as quickly as the Patriots wanted. And in the meantime, the Patriots seem quite happy to take any criticism, real or perceived and no matter the source, and turn it into fuel for their at times angry assault on the rest of the NFL.



© 2007 The Washington Post Company