Dems Question Latest Anti-War Strategy

By ANNE FLAHERTY
The Associated Press
Saturday, November 10, 2007; 1:52 AM

WASHINGTON -- Rank-and-file Democrats expressed dismay on Friday over their party's latest anti-war strategy, with some members reluctant to vote around Veterans Day to bring troops home. The House was on track to consider legislation next week that would give President Bush $50 billion for operations for Iraq and Afghanistan, but insist that he begin withdrawing troops.

The measure identifies a goal of ending combat by December 2008, leaving only enough soldiers and Marines behind to fight terrorists, train Iraqi security forces and protect U.S. assets.


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Cailf, center, accompanied by House Majority Whip James Clyburn of S.C., left and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Md., gestures during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photos/Susan Walsh)
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Cailf, center, accompanied by House Majority Whip James Clyburn of S.C., left and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Md., gestures during a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photos/Susan Walsh) (Susan Walsh - AP)
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi pushed off plans for a Friday vote after caucus members told her late Thursday they weren't sure they would support it. Liberal Democrats said the proposal was too soft, while conservative members told Pelosi they thought it went too far.

"I think the message in the next week ought to be that a heck of a lot of people have been harmed (in combat) and we ought to take care of them," said Rep. Gene Taylor, a conservative Mississippi Democrat who says his constituents mostly support the war.

Rep. John Murtha, chairman of the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee, said the vote was delayed because leadership was not satisfied it would pass. The proposal _ which also includes a provision that would effectively ban waterboarding and other aggressive interrogation techniques and restrict troop deployments _ might be tweaked to address member concerns, he said.

Pelosi told reporters on Friday that she was confident the measure would pass.

But one guarantee, Murtha said, is that Bush will have to accept some timetable on troop withdrawals if he wants the money.

"I don't think you'll see the House pass anything without restrictions," said Murtha, D-Pa.

White House spokesman Tony Fratto said Thursday that Bush would again veto any legislation that sets an "artificial timeline" for troop withdrawals.

"We should be supporting our troops as they are succeeding, not finding ways to undercut their mission," he said.

Pelosi, D-Calif., told members in a private caucus meeting on Thursday that if Bush rejected the measure, she did not intend on sending him another war spending bill for the rest of the year.

"It's a war without end," Pelosi later told reporters. "There is no light at the end of the tunnel. We must reverse it."


CONTINUED     1        >

© 2007 The Associated Press