Page 3 of 3   <      

Letters To the Editor

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

Jon Moseley

Alexandria

No Pendulum Here

Your otherwise excellent story on the Loudoun Board of Supervisors election ("Once Again, the Winds of Change," Loudoun Extra, Nov. 11) contains a regrettable error. It says that the defeated incumbents "won office in 2003 on a pledge to loosen controls on growth." Not so!

They ran an elaborate, expensive campaign featuring attack ads that accused previous board members of failing to control development, a campaign designed to make voters think they would keep controls on growth. Only after they were elected did they push their real agenda -- fast growth at taxpayer expense. We are living with the consequences -- destruction of the environment, rising taxes and traffic gridlock.

The swings in board policy were not due to swings in voter sentiment. In 2003, as in 1999 and 2007, the great majority voted for slower growth. The real story of this election is that the voters did not get fooled again.

Ed Jahn

Leesburg


<          3

© 2009 The Washington Post Company