washingtonpost.com
NEWS | OPINIONS | SPORTS | ARTS & LIVING | Discussions | Photos & Video | City Guide | CLASSIFIEDS | JOBS | CARS | REAL ESTATE
'); } //-->
Cab Riders Organize Online to Protest Fares
Proposed Base Rate Would Exceed Meter Fees in NYC, L.A. and Boston

By Sue Anne Pressley Montes
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 15, 2007; DZ01

The group D.C. Residents for Reasonable Taxi Fares was born shortly after Nov. 1, when Mayor Adrian M. Fenty (D) announced a drop rate of $4 for the District's new meter system.

Jack Jacobson, a lobbyist who lives in Dupont Circle and frequently uses taxis, was shocked. The drop rate -- the base fare that registers on the meter as soon as a rider enters a cab -- was higher than the rates in New York, Boston and Los Angeles. It was, he said, the highest in the nation, and surcharges for rush-hour travel, extra passengers and luggage put the potential costs even higher.

Soon, Jacobson was talking to his friends, who shared his outrage. Before long, D.C. Residents for Reasonable Taxi Fares was up and running, sending out a news release opposing the mayor's fare structure and setting up a Web site. On it, the group describes itself as a band of "citizens that have come together for a common cause."

"We are David versus Goliath," a statement on the Web site reads. "The taxicab industry in the District is organized and looking out for their best interests -- so we need to look out for the interests of those that depend on a taxi system that is honest and affordable."

The group launched an online petition Nov. 5 that asks Fenty to rescind his "ill-advised" proposal and adopt a $2.50 drop rate, the same fare used in New York. Although group members had applauded Fenty's decision to switch from zones to meters, they think he went too far in setting the new fares.

"When we saw new meter rates are going to be more expensive, we decided someone needed to take action," said Jacobson, 30, who described the organization as a "a group of friends, a growing group."

Olivia Conroy, who lives in the Kalorama area and works in consulting, quickly joined. She said she wonders how much analysis was put into the $4 figure. In a news release last week about the new fares and other regulations, Fenty's office said the regulations were created "after research and discussions about best practices with industry representatives, manufacturers, other cities and trade groups."

But Conroy, 28, said the decision making must be transparent.

"They need to show us some kind of analysis to show the $4 is correct," she said. "It seems like Mayor Fenty announced his decision and a week or so later, came up with the base fare. I wonder if they've had much time to do an analysis."

Like others in the group, she agrees that the system is in serious need of an overhaul.

"I think, in general, the entire system could be run more professionally," she said. "It seems that things are not as regulated as you would expect. Here in D.C., when you hop into a cab, you're not really sure what's going to happen. I'm not a tourist. I'm familiar with the zones, but it's still a guessing game all the time."

Although Fenty said he had planned to improve the District's taxi system anyway, he was forced to make a decision on meters because of a provision attached to D.C. legislation in Congress last year by Sen. Carl M. Levin (D.-Mich.), who said he was tired of constituents complaining about D.C. taxi service.

At a news conference Nov. 1, two weeks after he announced his decision to move to meters, Fenty announced he had decided on the $4 base charge, plus a rate of 25 cents for every one-sixth of a mile after the first sixth of a mile traveled. There also will be a charge of 25 cents for every minute stopped in traffic or traveled under 10 miles an hour. Fenty set an April 1 deadline for the city's 6,000 cabs to be outfitted with meters.

Residents were invited to comment on the fare structure by the end of December. A mayor's spokeswoman said Fenty will consider public opinions in his final decision.

In its first 24 hours, the petition launched by D.C. Residents for Reasonable Taxi Fares had collected more than 500 signatures, Jacobson said. Comments by those who signed were typical: "Ludicrous. Living in this city is expensive enough as it is." "Outrageous that we can get rid of the zones and still find a way to be ripped off." "Shockingly high."

In surveying other cities, Jacobson said he found no other area with a drop rate as high as $4. Across the river in Arlington, he said, the drop rate is $2.75.

A pilot study by the taxi commission of 21 cabs outfitted with meters in 2005 and 2006 showed what might happen with varying drop rates. With a $4 drop rate, meter fares averaged about 97 cents higher than zone fares. With a $2.50 drop rate, meter fares were on average 53 cents lower than zone fares.

Using the $4 drop rate, a fare of less than one mile was $7 on the meter, $8.03 with zones. With a $2.50 drop rate, the meter fare was $5.50 for less than one mile; the zone fare was again $8.03.

Steve Sushner, a lawyer and another member of the fledgling group, said his biggest complaint with the proposed fares has to do with the additional charges.

"It's surcharge on top of surcharge," said Sushner, 29. "There's a dollar surcharge for being in rush hour, then 25 cents per minute, then you put a snow emergency on top of that [when the rates double].

"I'm for meters," he said. "I just think the rates should be reasonable, and a $4 drop rate and all those surcharges are not reasonable."

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2007 The Washington Post Company